Q&A: Pizza Hut General Counsel On Building Your Brand and Defeating Stereotypes
Sarah Binder, who joined as GC at Pizza Hut last year, talks about challenges facing in-house legal teams.
November 08, 2019 at 05:47 AM
4 minute read
Restaurant chain Pizza Hut may be a well-known brand in the U.K. but as with most companies, its legal team operates quietly in the background with little fanfare.
Yet that's not how it works internally, according to Sarah Binder, general counsel at Pizza Hut U.K. & Europe, who is passionate about the brand an in-house lawyer creates in order to become known as a company's trusted adviser.
Binder will be taking part in a discussion on the topic at a UK event for law networking group Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) later this month. Here, she speaks with Legal Week about the internal status of in-house departments.
Why is building a strong brand within a legal team so important?
"Lawyers never talk about brands in the context of them as a function, so the topic has a unique pivot, as in-house functions do in fact have brands.
"Collaboration becomes 100% easier once your brand is set. It's really the difference between complete success and complete failure. It's about having a brand that is perceived as being passionately interested in the business, pragmatic and accessible. If you don't have that, you won't succeed as you won't understand your business and your advice won't be as good."
What have you learnt from building Pizza Hut's internal brand?
"First impressions are very important, as is engaging with stakeholders and being seen as accessible. You don't want to come across as passing judgement or being too 'lawyery' – you have to be open to new ideas and willing to listen.
"You want to be known as a contributor who goes beyond beyond just 'signing off the contract'. There's a well-known concept of 'legal signing off' – the words in-house lawyers never want to hear! This is because the GC role has now spread well beyond pure law, as in-house lawyers are now also strategic thinkers in the business."
Is having a recognised internal brand just as important as the external brand?
"I'm not sure how much time in-house lawyers consider their external brand – it's not something we spend a huge time thinking about from all angles. For an external brand, it's important to demonstrate that you take innovation on board as well as legal matters."
How are legal teams falling behind when building their brands?
"Legal teams in-house have to challenge the stereotype (which is rapidly disappearing but does still exist) around law functions being there to 'sign off' or being seen as 'blockers to the commercial teams'. There is still a risk in some organisations for that to be the template and in building an in-house brand you must ensure you challenge and overcome that assumption.
"This is so that you can be seen as true business partners that, for example, will be called on by the marketing team when working on an advertising campaign."
What are some other challenges facing legal teams?
"A first point is the increasing regulatory environment. We're progressing in the direction of increasing compliance requirements with increasing material consequences. With GDPR, there's the additional risk of higher fines for example.
"The digital environment also poses challenges because of the vast amounts of information lawyers must manage. Finding a solution that works for you is important as the right solution can be incredibly valuable and save you money – but you must do your homework to get to that point.
"Another issue is that the evolution of the GC role provides an additional component to your day job. There's not only the legal advice aspect, but also the commercial and regulatory perspective. It's a fantastic broadening of the role, but it requires a balance between the legal analysis and the strategic partnership elements."
Women, Influence & Power in Law UK will take place on November 19-21, 2019. A significant event in the U.S., the event is now launching in London. The women-only space will see top in-house and private practice lawyers come together to discuss the biggest issues in today's legal market. For more information and to buy tickets see here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Law Firm of the Year: A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Managing Partner
5 minute readInside Travers Smith's AI Training, Development Efforts
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250