Ashurst Expands Parental Leave Policies Following Review
The firm has introduced enhanced shared parental leave for its partnership globally among the changes introduced.
November 19, 2019 at 04:20 AM
2 minute read
Ashurst has broadened its parental leave policies globally following a review of its current offering.
For the first time, all of the firm's partners worldwide will be entitled to at least 18 weeks of fully-paid primary carer leave – traditionally maternity leave. In countries where the firm offers more generous packages – such as the U.K., which offers 26 weeks – it will remain the same.
Previously, the firm's primary carer leave entitlement across some jurisdictions was as low as eight weeks.
"Part of our thinking about diversity and inclusion is that we want to have good policies that support women, men and the whole family," Ashurst EMEA and U.S. HR head and HR operations global head Claire Townshend told Legal Week, Law.com's U.K. arm.
"We've looked at what we think is the right thing to do for several months," she said. "For primary carer leave, we decided a global minimum of 18 weeks was the right thing."
The firm has also expanded its parental leave – traditionally paternity leave – to entitle parents globally to receive two weeks of fully paid leave within the first eight weeks of the child's arrival. This doubles the current entitlement in several countries, such as Australia, and introduces paid leave for the first time in others, according to the firm.
In the U.K., the amount of time parents can take as shared parental leave – time taken off at the same time as the other parent – has increased from four to 18 weeks on full pay. This is reduced to 16 weeks where parental leave has already been taken. That change matches the current entitlement in Australia.
The increase follows a disappointing take-up of the policy by men in the firm's U.K. office, with only about 2% of new fathers taking up the option.
The new policies have been backdated, so any parents to a child born after 1 September are able to take advantage of the new policies.
Ashurst began a review of its policies in April, with the aim of increasing the number of men taking part in the U.K. scheme and having a more integrated global maternity programme.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readA&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers, Including Madrid Practice Head, to EY
3 minute readRosenblatt Breaks Away From RBG, Becomes 40-Strong Standalone Firm
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250