RPC Ditches All-Equity Partnership Structure
The firm has added new roles including fixed share equity partners and salaried partners, as well as an of counsel position, amid a battle for talent.
November 19, 2019 at 07:28 AM
2 minute read
RPC has undertaken a major shake-up of its partnership structure, introducing a number of new senior-level roles including salaried partner, of counsel and senior associate.
Previously, the firm operated a full-equity partnership and it claims that the changes reflect the changing expectations of its people, the market and client demand, as well as increasing opportunities for career progression.
The updated structure, which has been introduced with immediate effect, will offer RPC lawyers five options for senior legal careers at the firm: full equity partner, fixed share equity partner, salaried partner, of counsel and senior associate.
In a statement, RPC managing partner James Miller commented: "Like every business, we evolve and the market around us evolves too. Our all-equity structure has served us very well, but we know that the bar to achieving partnership here has been seen as very high.
"High standards are a good thing, of course, and that won't change, but we saw the need to offer our people alternative career destinations with titles that reflect their seniority and value – value to clients and value to the business.
"These new roles give people a credible and recognisable alternative to full equity partnership, if that's the route they wish to take."
He said the firm had spent a lot of time prior to the move listening to people's expectations and considerations when it comes to their career progression, adding: "The battle for talent is fierce. This new structure will help us to retain our best people, attract new talent and deliver better outcomes for our clients."
RPC is not the only firm to make alterations to its partnership structure in a bid to retain talent. Last year, Weil Gotshal announced plans to cut back its partner path by two years across all of its offices to seven and a half years, to retain associates.
Magic Circle firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer is also considering whether to implement a "performance-based acceleration mechanism" to its lockstep model, to enable high-performing junior partners to move up the pay ladder.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 2Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 3Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 42 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 5Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250