Simmons Creates New LLP to Mitigate German Privilege Concerns
Following a raid on Jones Day's Munich office there is "nervousness" around which documents will be covered by attorney-client privilege in the country post-Brexit.
November 25, 2019 at 05:17 AM
3 minute read
Simmons & Simmons has created a separate limited liability partnership (LLP) for its U.K. arm, amid concern over legal privilege issues arising in Germany post-Brexit.
The firm incorporated a new LLP with Companies House on November 1, under the names of its managing and senior partners, Jeremy Hoyland and Colin Passmore, respectively.
The decision to create a new LLP was driven by "nervousness" around Germany's limited view of documents that are covered by attorney-client privilege, one partner told Law.com affiliate Legal Week.
The partner said the creation of the new LLP was a precautionary measure, explaining: "It's there should it become necessary, but for now we're just keeping our options open."
They added: "The regulatory position for firms is getting more complicated, and there's no doubt that Brexit makes things even more complicated."
A spokesperson for the firm added in a statement: "This incorporation is a means of securing more flexibility for the firm in a post-Brexit world, where the relationship between the EU and U.K. remains unclear. The firm is well placed to continue to deliver smarter solutions for our clients both in the U.K. and continental Europe."
In March 2017, the Munich office of Jones Day was raided by the Munich Public Prosecutor's Office, with the authorities seizing documents and data supposedly related to the Volkswagen (VW) 'Dieselgate' emissions scandal as part of its own investigations into Audi, a VW subsidiary. Jones Day had been representing VW on its internal investigation.
In July of last year, the German Federal Constitutional Court ruled against a complaint raised by Jones Day, VW and individual Jones Day lawyers in Germany regarding the legality of the raid, although the court also ruled that the seized documents could not be used in the investigation of VW by prosecutors.
Munich-based Pinsent Masons compliance and investigations partner Eike Grunert said: "If you carefully look at the Jones Day decision, there was a part of the data that was seized and that data was downloaded from a server outside of Germany.
"However, it was clear the German authorities didn't have access to that unless they request judicial assistance from the authorities abroad first. So, there may be a practical way out in some instances to prevent or at least delay seizure, but you cannot establish an attorney-client privilege defence by such measures."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells & 10 Top Stories That Shaped Africa in 2024
4 minute readBorden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of Growing Threats From AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
3 minute readBaker & Partners, LCWP Lead on $1B Fraud Claim by Malaysia's 1MDB Against Amicorp
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250