Report: 'Top-Tier Firms' Provided Afterpay With Incorrect Legal Advice, Resulting in Money Laundering Breach
Dentons was one of the firms that advised Afterpay, but the firm said the advice it provided in 2016 was in line with industry practice at the time.
November 26, 2019 at 07:09 PM
2 minute read
The advice provided by global law firm Dentons to Australian fintech company Afterpay resulted in breaches of Australia's Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act regulations, an auditor has found.
But Dentons said the advice it provided in 2016 was in line with industry practice at the time.
The board of Afterpay Touch commissioned independent auditor Neil Jeans, principal of compliance adviser Initialism, to look into the breaches after it was ordered to do so by the anti-money laundering regulator, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), once the breaches came to light.
Jeans' report on the breaches stated: "Afterpay's compliance with its AML/CTF obligations was, from the outset and over time, based upon legal advice from top tier Australian law firms."
He said the initial legal advice concluded that Afterpay's business model was factoring receivables from merchants, so Afterpay initially focused its AML/CTF controls upon merchants.
"I am of the opinion this initial legal advice was incorrect," he wrote in a summary of his report to the Afterpay Touch board. "The initial legal advice provided to Afterpay did not reflect Afterpay's business model."
Afterpay provides loans to consumers in order to purchase goods from merchants, the auditor stated, and this has a different set of compliance obligations.
"Dentons was one of several firms that has acted for Afterpay," Dentons said in a statement. "Dentons is supportive of AUSTRAC's ongoing commitment to corporate compliance. Dentons considers the advice given to Afterpay was in line with the firm's understanding of Afterpay's business model and the law and industry practice."
Baker McKenzie also provided advice to the firm but said it did not do so at the time in question.
"References to the independent auditor's report regarding Afterpay's early non-compliance with anti-money laundering rules occurred at a time in which we [Baker McKenzie] were not advising the company on such matters," the firm said in a statement.
The auditor concluded that Afterpay is a low-risk business and is now compliant with the AML/CTF obligations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Hires 7-Lawyer Team to Beef Up ESG Practice in Brussels
2 minute readKirkland’s O’Shea Acts Alongside Former Outfit Simpson Thacher on KKR Deal
2 minute readKing & Spalding and Ex-Partner Accused of Fraud After Client Claims £1.7 Million Deposit Loss
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Data Disposition—Conquering the Seemingly Unscalable Mountain
- 2Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250