Hong Kong Law Society and Bar Association Defend Court Decision Against Beijing Attack
The Bar Association and even the conservative Law Society issued statements defending a Hong Kong court's ruling that the mask ban issued last month by the city government was unconstitutional.
November 27, 2019 at 03:30 PM
3 minute read
The Law Society of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Bar Association are publicly defending a Hong Kong court's decision that has come under attack from the Chinese government, with the Law Society warning that "nothing should be said or done that will undermine, or will be perceived to undermine, judicial independence and the rule of law".
The statement by the Law Society, the city's usually conservative professional body for solicitors, was issued following an attack by China's National People's Congress on a Hong Kong court ruling that overturned a controversial mask ban. The ban, which prohibits the wearing of masks during public assemblies, was passed in October after Carrie Lam, Hong Kong's chief executive, enacted emergency powers that allowed her to bypass the territory's parliament. Demonstrators have worn masks throughout the protests to avoid police identification.
But the Hong Kong court ruled last Friday that the ban was incompatible with what is called the Basic Law – Hong Kong's mini-constitution. That did not sit well with the government in Beijing. China's National People's Congress issued a statement saying only the National People's Congress Standing Committee, the nation's top legislative body, had the power to decide whether Hong Kong laws complied with the Basic Law.
In addition to the Hong Kong Law Society, the Hong Kong Bar Association – the professional body for barristers – issued a statement in response to China's insistence that only it had the power to decide whether a Hong Kong law was constitutional.
"The courts in Hong Kong have previously struck down unconstitutional laws. There was no suggestion previously that the courts cannot do so," the bar association said in a statement. "As has been held by the Court of Appeal, Hong Kong courts must apply the letter and spirit of the Basic Law and the Bill of Rights and it is their 'duty' to strike down unconstitutional laws. Indeed, for a court not to decide any case which argues that a legislative provision is contrary to the Basic Law is to fail to uphold the Basic Law, which every judicial officer has sworn to do."
The Hong Kong government on Monday appealed the court decision overturning the mask ban and the High Court agreed to grant a one-week suspension of the ruling. The court has now extended the suspension until next month, allowing the ban at least temporarily to remain in effect. The court is expected to issue a decision on December 10.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCarey Abogados’ Senior Partner Becomes New Head of IBA, First Chilean to Assume Role of President
Goodwin Hires Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner to Launch Brussels Office
3 minute readClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Jenner & Block Expands London Team with Baker McKenzie Hire to Lead New Practice Area
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250