Brazil Joins Colombia, Uruguay in Regulating Medical Cannabis
The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, Anvisa, has approved the sale of THC and CBD products at drugstores, enabling consumers to obtain cannabis-derived products.
December 05, 2019 at 05:21 PM
4 minute read
Brazil has become the third country in Latin America to regulate medical marijuana, joining Uruguay and Colombia in allowing more consumers to obtain cannabis-derived products.
The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, Anvisa, on Tuesday unanimously approved the sale of THC and CBD products at drugstores across the country of 210 million inhabitants. The decree is to take effect in about 90 days, with products expected to hit store shelves in early 2020.
The Anvisa ruling does not authorise commercial cultivation of cannabis. Within hours of the announcement, however, a Brazilian judge granted Schoenmaker Humako Agri-Floriculture, part of the Terra Viva group, the right to import and grow industrial hemp seeds with THC concentration below 0.3%.
Denver-based Hoban Law Group advised Schoenmaker Humako on its petition. The 60-year-old company, which was founded by a Dutch couple in the city of Holambra, in the state of São Paulo, is a major Brazilian flower and potato producer. Now it wants to plant hemp to produce fibre, food and especially medicines.
Bob Hoban, founding partner at Hoban Law Group, called Brazil's steps toward domestic cannabis distribution "extremely significant", saying this week's approval by the national healthcare agency represents a major advancement in the early stages of Latin American cannabis policy.
Latin American nations have been at the forefront of the movement to enact legislation, regulation and policies aimed at providing pieces of the international supply chain for cannabis, Hoban noted. Mexico is also in the midst of drafting legislation for legal cannabis. Yet Hoban says countries like Brazil could go further.
"With so much competition in this nascent industry, it is essential that new markets also supply cannabis domestically. This is not something that we have seen by way of policy in many of the Latin American nations," Hoban said.
The conservative government of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro worries that greater flexibility for cannabis, and in particular facilities for planting, could lead to an increase in recreational use of the plant.
This week's regulatory ruling represents "part of a slow change of mindset" for the conservative government, said Isabela Amorim Diniz Ferreira, a corporate lawyer with expertise in regulatory matters at Farroco Abreu Advogados in the city of São Paulo.
Farroco Abreu Advogados is one of a handful of Brazilian law firms that has taken a deep dive into the burgeoning cannabis sector to advise Brazilian entrepreneurs on regulatory and other matters related to the business. According to Amorim Diniz Ferreira, the law firm has also been fielding calls from international cannabis companies that are looking to do business in Brazil.
Market intelligence firm New Frontier Data puts the annual value of the medicinal cannabis market in Brazil at $1.4 billion, based on estimates that millions of Brazilians suffer from chronic pain.
Still, the stipulation that Brazilian companies import expensive raw materials to produce these medicines could put the remedies out of reach for many in Brazil, where the per capita annual income is $8,920.
A bill is currently being discussed in the Brazilian Congress to amend the country's anti-drug law. Amorim Diniz Ferreira expects this bill to now include the possibility of planting, cultivating and harvesting cannabis domestically. Brazil has the potential to become a cannabis-producing powerhouse, she said, as it's already a major supplier of agricultural goods on the world stage.
Anvisa has gradually eased restrictions on cannabis. In 2015, the regulator allowed imports of Cannabidiol-based products for healthcare. Two years later, it included cannabis sativa in its list of medicinal plants. According to agency data, more than 9,000 authorisations were granted to import medicines made from cannabis extract between 2015 and 2019.
This week's Anvisa decision to regulate cannabis followed a host of recent court rulings in Brazil favouring medical marijuana use. A Brazilian court authorised the parents of an autistic child with severe epileptic seizures to grow cannabis, while in another case, a stomach cancer patient was also granted an exemption. More than 50 Brazilians have been authorised by local courts to produce their own cannabis oil for medicinal use.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250