'I Kind of Wished I Was Dead', Gary Senior Tells Disciplinary Tribunal
"There were moments when I felt very, very low," he said, amid the "acute stress" brought on by the investigation into his alleged sexual harassment.
December 06, 2019 at 09:37 AM
3 minute read
Baker McKenzie's former London head Gary Senior said there were times when he wished he was dead amid the "acute stress" brought on by the investigation into his alleged sexual harassment, London's Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal heard on Friday.
Senior, who also stands accused of improperly influencing the internal investigation into the alleged 2012 incident, was asked questions about the intention behind emails he sent to Tom Cassels, the lead investigator into the matter at the time.
Senior said that his intention was simply to better cope with the process and that he was "suffering acute stress".
"I don't believe I was suicidal at the time, but there were dark moments," he told the hearing. "There were moments when I kind of wished I was dead, but a lot of people say that. When you are feeling in a bad way, you have got to talk to someone."
"There were moments when I felt very, very low," he said, adding that he had conversations with Cassels and Blackburn at the time in which he was expressing his "deep remorse and apology" but remained careful as to what he was communicating to them.
He also said there is evidence of him asking Cassels and Blackburn to find "somebody to talk to", while carrying on his job as a managing partner, but to make sure it was kept confidential.
He also added that the current proceedings have had an impact on him. Earlier this week, he mentioned that he'd found Person A's evidence in the hearings "distressing".
In a tense morning session, counsel for all the respondents asked the tribunal to take action relating to a RollOnFriday story published on Friday morning that provided details of a leaked Simmons & Simmons report into the firm's handling of the episode.
The counsel requested the tribunal to ask the publication to take down the story and to invite RollOnFriday's "editor" to explain why it was published in the first place. They called it "inadmissible", "irrelevant" and "prejudicial" to the proceedings and said there "clearly is a deliberate attempt to derail the proceedings".
The tribunal panel said there was no formal order it could issue and it would leave it to the parties to decide how they want to deal with the issue. The story has since been taken down.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Continues Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Ted Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ed Sheeran Meets Led Zeppelin in the Second Circuit
- 2You Too Can Be a Programmer: How Generative AI Can Upskill Any E-Discovery Professional to Write Code
- 3Is Arbitration Working?
- 4New Battleground: Wall Street Law Firms Eye London Growth
- 5Standstill: Court Defers to Legislature on Texas Healthcare
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250