Gary Senior Investigators 'Betrayed Their Colleagues', Baker McKenzie London Head Claimed
Alex Chadwick wrote to the SRA to stress "the level of shock and anger within the LLP" after the incident emerged.
December 17, 2019 at 07:24 AM
2 minute read
Baker McKenzie's current London managing partner said the trio involved in an internal investigation into alleged misconduct had "betrayed their colleagues" and "acted fundamentally at odds with the values of the firm", the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) into the incident heard on Tuesday.
Alex Chadwick's comments were made in a letter responding to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in 2018, Gary Senior's counsel Gregory Treverton-Jones QC said at the hearing on Tuesday morning during cross-examination of one of the internal investigators, Tom Cassels.
Chadwick had replied to the regulator after the alleged historical misconduct by Senior and subsequent internal investigation into it – led by then HR director Martin Blackburn and disputes partner Cassels – emerged last year. The SRA wrote to the firm, Senior, Blackburn and Cassels as a result.
Chadwick also said in his response that Senior, Cassels and Blackburn had "subverted the firm's process", according to Treverton-Jones.
Chadwick went on to add in the letter that he wanted to emphasise "the level of shock and anger within the LLP" that the three had "acted fundamentally at odds with the values of the LLP and the firm", Treverton-Jones continued.
Cassels' counsel, Richard Coleman QC, interjected to stress that the firm had not made those assertions in its previous statements.
Cassels said he rejected the contents of the letter.
Chadwick was appointed London managing partner of the firm in 2016 and recently won a second term at the helm of the office.
Previously in the SDT hearing, which kicked off in early December, SRA counsel Andrew Tabachnik QC of 39 Essex Chambers told the tribunal there had been a "complete collective failure" within the firm to "take any steps to prevent Gary Senior from seeking to influence the process [of the investigation]". The SRA has argued that emails sent between Senior, Blackburn and Cassels attest to it being influenced.
The hearing continues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Continues Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Ted Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1You Too Can Be a Programmer: How Generative AI Can Upskill Any E-Discovery Professional to Write Code
- 2Is Arbitration Working?
- 3New Battleground: Wall Street Law Firms Eye London Growth
- 4Standstill: Court Defers to Legislature on Texas Healthcare
- 5Should It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250