Brazilian Bar Association Warns Global Firms Not to Overstep by Advising on Local Law
The country's bar association is specifically investigating whether Cleary Gottlieb and other firms are offering prohibited advice on Brazilian matters.
January 27, 2020 at 05:53 PM
4 minute read
The Brazilian bar association says it will take a closer look at how foreign law firms are conducting themselves in the country following multiple complaints that global firms are providing services that only local firms may provide.
Ary Raghiant Neto, deputy secretary-general of the Order of Brazilian Attorneys, said in a statement last week that the order "will not tolerate" foreign firms overstepping their bounds by providing advice on Brazilian law.
The order allows non-Brazilian firms to advise on legal matters in their home countries but expressly forbids foreign law firms from consulting on Brazilian law even if they do so in conjunction with Brazilian members of the bar association.
"We do not want to restrict the Brazilian market, far from it," said Raghiant Neto, while cautioning that foreign firms must comply with the bar's provision dictating the parameters of their service.
Brazil is an integral piece of many Latin American law practices. Its $1.8 trillion economy is the largest in the region and this year, a series of planned asset sales and other market liberalizations are expected to generate lots of corporate work for global firms.
The Brazilian bar association authorizes foreign firms on a discretionary basis to conduct business in the country. But some services, such as big-ticket matters like internal investigations and due diligence, could fall into a gray area.
Raghiant Neto also sent a letter dated Jan. 21 to the president of Brazilian development bank BNDES asking for more detail on the hiring of New York-based Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, together with Brazilian firm Levy & Salomão Advogados, to conduct an internal audit for BNDES.
He asked for an explanation of the role played by Cleary Gottlieb lawyers, emphasizing that foreigners and foreign economic groups are "prohibited" from practicing law in Brazil. The contract was reportedly worth the equivalent of more than $11 million.
In a statement to Law.com International, Cleary Gottlieb said that it "conducts all of its activities in Brazil in accordance with applicable laws."
Cleary Gottlieb is a top-billing international firm with a dozen lawyers in Brazil. It has been counsel on over $100 billion in capital markets offerings by Brazilian issuers since 2000 and on nearly $60 billion in Brazil-related mergers and acquisitions during the same period.
The firm opened its São Paulo office in 2011 after more than 40 years of serving clients located in Brazil or doing business there.
The Order of Brazilian Attorneys grants global firms like Cleary Gottlieb licenses to operate as foreign legal consultants in Brazil with the understanding that their lawyers will not advise on matters of Brazilian law—even if they have bar admissions in Brazil.
The BNDES investigation, which involved probing allegations of bribery related to transactions with meatpacker JBS and pulp maker Eldorado, is one of several investigations that Cleary Gottlieb has worked on in Brazil.
The firm assisted a special committee of the board of M. Dias Branco, a Brazilian foodstuff company, in connection with an independent investigation of allegations of bribery. It also helped miners BHP Billiton, Vale, and Samarco with an investigation of the collapse of the Fundão tailings dam in the Minas Gerais region of Brazil.
Compared with local firms, large global law firms may have more expertise, manpower and technology tools they can apply to arduous revisions of voluminous emails and other documents that could point to corruption within companies.
Sometimes, investigations relate directly to dispelling concerns of U.S. authorities. For instance, Cleary Gottlieb aided a special committee of the board of directors of Brazilian airline GOL with investigations into potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act being conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
"When you say that foreign law firms can only practice foreign law, sometimes that's not easy to distinguish," said Allen Moreland, a partner at New York-based Robinson Brog who is also registered as a foreign legal adviser with the Brazilian bar association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250