Dechert Partner Accused of Orchestrating a 'Secret Prison' in the Middle East
The allegations were made against partner Neil Gerrard, who gave evidence as a witness in a wider London High Court case on Tuesday.
January 29, 2020 at 04:37 AM
4 minute read
Dechert said it had no comment to make.
Dechert partner Neil Gerrard "orchestrated" an Emirate's "secret prison" where suspects are "held without due process for them to be interrogated", a businessman has claimed in a court filing.
Farhad Azima, an American-Iranian businessman alleged in his skeleton argument that Gerrard, a London-based Dechert partner and deputy chair of the firm's Europe, Middle East and Asia litigation group, "oversees" a "secret prison" in the United Arab Emirate of Ras Al Khaimah (RAK).
Azima claimed he had learned of Gerrard's alleged involvement after having been "involved in efforts [known as 'Project Clay'] to shine a light on serious human rights abuses in RAK, including by investigating allegations that RAK was holding suspects without due process for them to be interrogated," according to his skeleton argument.
Gerrard was not directly asked about the claim that he orchestrated a "secret prison" in RAK and said he had no knowledge of any human rights abuses in RAK.
Azima is currently facing a commercial claim for damages totalling £3.7 million for "breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation and unlawful means of conspiracy". The claim is being brought by a RAK state entity, the Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA).
Gerrard is adviser to RAKIA in a long-running dispute between the entity and its former CEO, Dr. Massaad, leading to a settlement agreement in 2016 negotiated by Massaad's friend Farhad Azima. On Tuesday, Gerrard gave evidence as a witness in the proceedings brought by RAKIA against Azima at London's High Court.
During his cross-examination, Gerrard he said he interviewed two detainees in a prison in RAK in relation to the investigation into Massaad.
The barrister cross-examining him said a report communicated to Gerrard revealed that Massaad and Azima were about to go public with allegations of human rights abuses in a prison that the skeleton argument says was orchestrated by Gerrard in RAK. The barrister added that the report further revealed that a "London law firm will be reporting Dechert to the authorities" in relation to that allegation.
Gerrard later said he had been reported to and investigated by U.K. regulator the Solicitors Regulation Authority and said the SRA found "no evidence to substantiate the claim", but he did not specify exactly what that related to.
Gerrard said the jails where his interviews took place were "more modern than the ones I have seen" and that he had "followed the process of PACE [the Police and Criminal Evidence Act] with the detainees", who had agreed in writing to being interviewed. According to Gerrard, the interviews took place in the presence of their respective lawyers and with their written agreement.
RAKIA says in its skeleton argument that Azima's claim relating to "Project Clay" is "absurd" a way to "divert attention from his own wrongdoing", as well as an attempt to "denigrating the Ruling family and Government of RAK, RAKIA and RAKIA's lawyers in the international media".
The entity added in its skeleton argument that "there is no evidence that human rights abuses of the sort [...] were in fact occurring".
Azima has also claimed in the filing that Gerrard "threatened" him of becoming "collateral damage" during a meeting taking place in July 2016. In court on Tuesday, Gerrard denied he had threatened him in any way.
RAKIA also denies that claim, stating in its skeleton argument that "no such threat was made" and that "Azima's account of the meeting is false."
RAKIA claims that Azima "obtained millions of dollars from it by a series of elaborate frauds carried out with the assistance of its former chief executive, Dr Khater Massaad".
The entity said in court filings that in March 2016, it had paid Azima $2.6 million through a settlement agreement in respect to one of those ventures.
But in August 2016, Azima's emails were hacked to reveal "bad faith and frauds by Mr Azima over a number of years" resulting in RAKIA bringing the claim against him, according to RAKIA's skeleton argument. Azima claims in his skeleton argument that RAKIA was behind the hack.
Gerrard denied having been provided access to Azima's illegally hacked emails by RAKIA during cross-examination.
RAKIA is represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix Chambers instructed by Stewarts Law. Meanwhile, Azima is represented by Tim Lord QC instructed by Burlington Legal.
A spokesperson for Dechert said: "These are ongoing proceedings to which we are not a party and we have no comment to make."
The case continues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![India’s Cyril Amarchand Bolsters Real Estate Offering, Hires 7-Lawyer Team From Luthra and Luthra India’s Cyril Amarchand Bolsters Real Estate Offering, Hires 7-Lawyer Team From Luthra and Luthra](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2021/10/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
India’s Cyril Amarchand Bolsters Real Estate Offering, Hires 7-Lawyer Team From Luthra and Luthra
![Winston & Strawn’s London Office Makes Double Department Chair Hire Winston & Strawn’s London Office Makes Double Department Chair Hire](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2022/11/Winston-Strawn-Office-Sign-NEW-767x633.jpg)
![Withers Hires Disputes Partner From Morgan Lewis to Lead Litigation Group in Singapore Withers Hires Disputes Partner From Morgan Lewis to Lead Litigation Group in Singapore](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/3f/cd/a05ce8cb4adea567c5001415b3a2/pardeepsinghkhosa-767x633.jpg)
Withers Hires Disputes Partner From Morgan Lewis to Lead Litigation Group in Singapore
![Kirkland, Hengeler, DLA Piper Advise on Metro Supermarket Delisting in Frankfurt Kirkland, Hengeler, DLA Piper Advise on Metro Supermarket Delisting in Frankfurt](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2021/06/new-crop-Frankfurt-skyline-767x633.jpg)
Kirkland, Hengeler, DLA Piper Advise on Metro Supermarket Delisting in Frankfurt
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Donald Trump Serves Only De Facto and Not De Jure: A Status That Voids His Acts Usurping the Power of Congress or the Courts
- 2Georgia Hacker Pleads Guilty in SEC X Account Scam That Moved Markets
- 3Trump's Pick for SEC Chair Likely to Stymie Shareholder Proposals from ESG Advocates
- 4Adobe’s Chief Cyber Legal & Privacy Officer Talks Managing Gen AI Risks, Cyber Training
- 5The M&A Partners Who Drove the Most Business as Deal Leads Last Year
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250