EU Issues Strategy for Building 5G Network, Does Not Ban Huawei
The "5G toolbox" approach is designed to allay concerns about Huawei.
January 29, 2020 at 06:06 PM
3 minute read
The European Union has set out a strategy recommending that member states limit "high-risk" 5G vendors, a category that includes the Chinese tech giant Huawei. But it stopped short of recommending a full ban on the firm, despite aggressive lobbying by the Trump administration.
The recommendations are just that: The EU's individual member states have the final word on whether and to what degree they will allow Huawei to help build their next generation of wireless telecommunications networks.
The EU's recommendations, dubbed the "5G toolbox," were presented Wednesday by Margrethe Vestager, the commission's vice president for digital issues and competition, and Thierry Bréton, the commissioner for industry. They are designed to ensure that the Commission and the member states work together on 5G network security.
"We can do great things with 5G," Vestager said at a press conference. "The technology supports personalized medicines, precision agriculture and energy grids that can integrate all kinds of renewable energy. This will make a positive difference. But only if we can make our networks secure. Only then will the digital changes benefit all citizens."
The strategy does not mention any companies or countries by name, although it is generally understood to be aimed at vendors like Huawei.
Under the "toolbox" approach, all EU members agree to take measures to ensure the highest level of security. These include assessing the risk profiles of suppliers, applying restrictions to suppliers considered to be high risk and, where necessary, excluding some companies from critical and sensitive assets. They also agreed to have a strategy for the diversification of vendors.
The EU's announcement comes on the heels of a decision by the U.K. on Tuesday, in which it will allow Huawei to provide equipment for part of the country's 5G network but would keep it from some more strategically sensitive infrastructure, such as nuclear power and defense systems.
The United States claims that Huawei poses a serious threat to national security, alleging that it can be compelled by Chinese law to hand over data or spy on behalf of the Chinese government. Some European officials have voiced similar concerns.
Huawei denies it is in any way a threat to other nations and insists it would never engage in espionage.
On Friday, the U.K. will officially leave the EU, but Vestager said the U.K.'s strategy on the roll-out of a 5G network appears to be in line with the EU's. "There is a sense of convergence," she said.
She also stressed the importance of the European Commission and the member states working together to deliver network security.
"We take all the tools we have available in order to make sure that … we have a consistent approach to 5G security," she said.
The announcements in Brussels on Wednesday and London on Tuesday are viewed as a victory for Huawei, which lobbied hard in Europe after it was all but banned from doing business in the U.S. The decisions by both also come despite intensive lobbying by the Trump administration, which pressured the EU and its member countries to join in banning Huawei.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Racial Discrimination Complaint Triggered South African IT Probe
4 minute readHogan Lovells Takes Partner Quartet, Hiring from Dechert, Ashurst in Singapore
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250