Companies Should Expect Larger, More Frequent GDPR Fines
A new report warns that data protection regulators across Europe "have been staffing up their enforcement teams and getting to grips with the new regime," which means it's more important than ever for companies to be GDPR-compliant.
February 04, 2020 at 01:40 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Fines imposed under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation have been relatively low and infrequent. But companies need to prepare for bigger penalties as authorities throughout Europe bolster enforcement efforts and clarify how fines are calculated and imposed.
"As things develop, as years go by and those holes are understood, it's going to get harder for those companies to say, 'We didn't really understand or know,'" said Kevin Levy, a partner at GrayRobinson's Miami office who chairs the firm's technology transactions practice.
Since the GDPR took effect in May 2018, data protection regulators have imposed about $126 million in total reported fines, "which is quite low given that supervisory authorities enjoy the power to fine up to 4% of total worldwide annual turnover the preceding financial year," according to a new survey from DLA Piper.
The report, which notes that not all GDPR fines are made public, cautions that regulators throughout Europe "have been staffing up their enforcement teams and getting to grips with the new regime. It takes time to build a robust case to justify higher fines." The report's authors could not be immediately reached for comment.
With potentially more painful GDPR fines on the horizon, companies that want to avoid getting dinged need to implement and maintain programs to map the personal data that they collect, store and share, Levy said.
"If you want to protect yourself you need to have a program in place that upper management has bought into," he said. "If upper management hasn't bought in, it's not going to get the funding and support it needs and the people below aren't going to take it seriously."
He added that companies also need to remain vigilant as undeveloped parts of the GDPR are being exposed. For instance, hackers are using the GDPR to request personal information for other people and exploiting companies that lack the ability to identify scammers.
"They don't even have to hack into your system," Levy said. "They just have to follow the [GDPR] rules."
Breach notifications across the EU have increased from an average of 247 per day during the first eight months that the GDPR was in effect to 278 notifications per day, a 12.6% bump, from Jan. 28, 2019, to Jan. 27 of this year.
Last year saw several big companies, including Google, British Airways, Marriott International Inc. and Deutsche Wohnen SE, face significant fines for alleged GDPR infractions. Google, which was fined $55 million for violations related to personalized ads, has vowed to appeal, a move that "will become much more common" as long as the GDPR rules are murky, the survey states.
DLA Piper predicts that it will take "several years if not a decade—before a standard methodology starts to emerge from the jurisprudence of Member State courts, from the European Court of Justice and from the European Data Protection Board."
Read More:
4 Companies That Were on the GDPR's 2019 Naughty List
GDPR-Based Objections to U.S. Discovery Requests: 2019 Year in Review
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJones Day, BCLP & Other Major Firms Boost European Teams with Key Partner Hires
4 minute read$13.8 Billion Magomedov Claim Thrown Out by UK High Court
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250