Asian Markets Make Major Strides Into Legaltech
Last year marked a milestone for legaltech in Singapore, India, Japan, and Mongolia.
February 06, 2020 at 03:00 AM
5 minute read
By John Kang
Asia, a region known for some of the world's most innovative technology companies and tech-savvy populations, has been surprisingly slow to adopt legal technology. But several Asian legal markets — Singapore, India, Japan and even Mongolia — started to make headway in 2019.
Last June, Singapore, the legaltech hub of Asia, launched the region's first major legaltech-focused startup accelerator. Called Global Legal Innovation and Digital Entrepreneurship (GLIDE), the accelerator is the latest effort by the Future Law Innovation Programme (FLIP), a pilot program created in 2018 by the Singapore Academy of Law, a government body, to promote legaltech.
GLIDE selected seven startups from around the world for its inaugural cohort: LegalFAB and LexKnights in Singapore, BriefBox and Checkbox in Sydney, Remedium in Perth, Anduin in San Francisco and Legal Navigator in Dubai. That group graduated from the program with a Demo Day on Jan. 16, when startups demonstrated their companies to prospective investors.
The startup accelerator is the most significant initiative so far by FLIP, which is in its final year. The Singapore Academy of Law declined to comment on FLIP's plans for 2020, saying only that it is currently reviewing plans for FLIP.
But FLIP played a big part in putting the small city-state of Singapore on the legaltech map. The program was mentioned as a milestone in Singapore's legaltech scene in a November report by the Law Society of England & Wales, which named the city-state one of the 10 emerging legaltech markets in the world; the only other Asian cities listed among the 10 were Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur.
In India, there was also a landmark development in the country's legaltech scene. In February 2019, India's largest firm, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, launched Prarambh, the first legaltech startup incubator in the country. In October, the six-month incubator program selected three local startups as its first cohort: JRTC Intern, Leegality and LegalMind.
Prarambh is the latest legaltech effort by Cyril Amarchand, which had broken ground in the area before. It was the first firm in India to adopt artificial intelligence technology in its day-to-day practice, signing up with Canadian machine-learning software provider Kira Systems in 2017 to process contracts and other legal documents more quickly and accurately. "We have been the first to adopt a number of new technologies in the legal space, such as artificial intelligence-based machine learning, and we are now the first to support and incubate technology startups," managing partner Cyril Shroff said in a statement.
Japan also saw one of its major firms make a move into legaltech. Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu, one of the four largest Japanese firms, formed an alliance with MNTSQ Ltd., a legaltech startup and an affiliate of Tokyo-listed machine-learning technology company PKSHA Technology Inc. In addition, Nagashima Ohno will invest about $7 million in MNTSQ over the next several years.
"We believe it is important to actively utilize technologies such as natural language processing in the field of legal services in Japan, which is entering a period of change," said Fumihide Sugimoto, managing partner of Nagashima Ohno. "We strongly hope that this alliance will lead to the development of higher-quality legaltech."
And in Mongolia, one of the country's leading domestic firms pushed the developing nation into legaltech. In November, MDS KhanLex launched iGeree, a legaltech platform that automates contracts and has a chatbot feature powered by artificial intelligence. The platform is the first significant legaltech initiative by a major firm in Mongolia.
IGeree is for small- and medium-sized companies in Mongolia, where there is a dearth of lawyers. "Once the accessibility of legal services is in the palm of the consumers, then they really get the true access to justice," said MDS KhanLex managing partner Maizorig Janchivdorj. "That will bring advantage to the protection of their interests."
MDS KhanLex has more plans for legaltech. It is preparing to establish a dedicated research institute with local startup CodeLex and is in collaboration with several companies in data engineering and AI. CodeLex was founded in 2018 by Janchivdorj and claims to be the first legaltech company in Mongolia.
The research institute will help solve an urgent issue in Mongolia: the lack of tech experts. "That is the No. 1 issue," said Janchivdorj. "It's difficult to find good engineers [in Mongolia]. Unless you get involved and try to change that, nothing will change."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Mulls Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250