'Brexit Influenced Our Decision' — Why a Major Japanese Law Firm Chose Germany as Its First European Base
Nishimura & Asahi debuted in Europe last week, with a duo of office openings in Frankfurt and Düsseldorf.
February 06, 2020 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
Brexit was a key factor when a major Japanese law firm chose Germany as its first European base, the firm's German lead said.
Last week, one of Japan's largest law firms, Nishimura & Asahi, announced it will open two new offices in Germany.
It became the first of the Japanese majors to debut in Europe, with the other elite players – Nagashima Ohno, Mori Hamada & Matsumoto, and Anderson Mori & Tomotsune – yet to establish European bases.
In an interview, Dominik Kruse, co-leading partner for the German offices, told Law.com International that Brexit was as a key factor in its choice to debut in Germany.
"I think we can say that Brexit has, of course, influenced our decision to open our first European offices in Germany," he said. "The share of foreign investments in continental Europe versus the U.K. has been increasing steadily over the last years, and Brexit is certainly a driver for this."
He added that he would not be surprised if other firms followed his firm's example, "as they often have done in the past."
Nishimura anticipates law firm investment to continue in Germany, but also in Eastern Europe. Kruse described Frankfurt as a "gateway" to Eastern Europe, putting the firm in the "best position to serve our clients' current needs as far as investments in Europe are concerned."
A partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's German base described Nishimura's debut as a "surprising move," adding that it remains to be seen whether it will be significant.
Meanwhile, a person at a large German firm said the move likely follows a recent surge in investment from Japan into the region, with transactions with Japanese companies becoming increasingly common.
"It's not bad timing." they continued. "For the market, it is a positive move."
Kruse said the firm's approach is not one of "competing with the incumbent German or international firms," as it prefers a collaborative approach.
"Our local presence is an opportunity for us as much as for the many firms we regularly work with to deepen our relationships and to expand our client bases," he said.
Kruse also said his firm will once again consider other European cities, should it serve client interests and the market remain favorable.
"London, or maybe Brussels, would be obvious candidates," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250