European Commission Launches Probe Into Proposed Eyewear Merger
The Commission said it is concerned that the eyeglass maker's purchase of eyeglass retailer GrandVision could result in higher prices.
February 06, 2020 at 04:48 PM
2 minute read
The European Commission has opened an in-depth investigation into a planned merger between GrandVision, Europe's largest eyeglasses retail chain, and EssilorLuxottica, the world's largest eyewear supplier.
The Commission believes the merger, which was announced in December, could reduce competition for the wholesale supply of ophthalmic lenses and eyewear as well as some retail optical products.
"EssilorLuxottica is the world's largest supplier of eyewear and GrandVision is Europe's largest optical retail chain. In this consolidating market, we need to carefully assess whether the proposed merger would lead to higher prices or reduced choices for consumers when they visit their local optician," Margrethe Vestager, the EU's antitrust chief, said in a statement.
EssilorLuxottica, a French-Italian company with headquarters in Paris, is the world's largest supplier of eyeglass lenses and eyewear and owns well-known brands, such as Ray-Ban and Oakley. The company also runs retail outlets, mainly in the U.K. and Italy.
GrandVision, a Dutch company, is an eyewear retailer and owns some of the largest chains in Europe, such as GrandOptical and Pearle. It has over 7,000 stores in over 40 countries worldwide.
EssilorLuxottica sells its products to optical retailers, including GrandVision. Those retailers then sell the glasses to consumers.
A preliminary investigation by the Commission raised concerns about EssilorLuxottica's strong market position in the wholesale supply of optical products and GrandVision's leading presence in the retail distribution of those products.
The Commission said its investigation would focus on whether EssilorLuxottica would use its strong market presence in the lenses and eyewear market to raise prices or impose worsening conditions on retailers that compete with GrandVision. It would also look at whether the merged entity could limit access for competing suppliers of lenses or eyewear, as GrandVision owns the largest optical products distribution network in Europe.
|Read More:
Three firms win roles on €46bn merger between Ray-Ban owner and French lens maker
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Racial Discrimination Complaint Triggered South African IT Probe
4 minute readHogan Lovells Takes Partner Quartet, Hiring from Dechert, Ashurst in Singapore
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250