Akin Gump London Revenue Rises 30% In Two Years
Firm chair Kim Koopersmith said a 3% increase in revenue per lawyer, along with a 2.8% jump in lawyer head count, are positive signs for the firm's future.
February 13, 2020 at 04:42 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
In a decade that included post-Great Recession recovery and significant expansion internationally, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld is pointing to 10 straight years of revenue gains as a major win.
Gross revenue increased by 5.9% to $1.14 billion at Akin Gump in 2019, and profits per equity partner and revenue per lawyer also improved when compared with 2018 results.
"We look at it as not just a good year, but a good decade," said Kim Koopersmith, chairwoman of the Texas-founded Am Law 100 firm. During that time, the firm added offices in Dubai, Frankfurt, Hong Kong and Singapore, and head count increased by 16.1%.
Akin Gump is not the only firm to have experienced such a fruitful decade. Cooley, for instance, in announcing earlier this week that it grew revenue by more than 8% in 2019, also touted 10 straight years of growth.
Akin Gump's 2019 revenue of $1.14 billion compares with $1.07 billion in 2018. Net income was $464 million, up 4.3% from $445.3 the year before.
RPL, at $1.25 million, was up 3% from $1.21 million in 2018, even as the firm's lawyer head count increased by 2.8% to 910 on a full-time equivalent basis.
PEP came in at $2.6 million, up 8.2% when compared with $2.4 million in 2018, as the number of equity partners declined by 3.2% to 179.
Koopersmith said the increase in RPL demonstrates that the firm is growing revenue in sync with its head count. And, she noted, experiencing growth in PEP is a "great place to be."
She attributed the firm's success in the lateral hiring market—it brought on 23 lateral partners last year—to its solid position in the market. The hires included nine each in London and Washington, D.C., which are two of the firm's three largest offices. The other is New York.
"We grew where it made sense to grow," Koopersmith said.
Demand was strong across practices, she said, including litigation, financial restructuring and corporate work. The energy practice runs throughout the firm, and creates connections between offices, for instance, Houston and London, she added.
Looking across the pond, the London office had a "banner year," Koopersmith said, with revenue in that office coming in at $125.1 million, up from a strong 2018 and up nearly $29 million from 2017. She said lawyers in London worked on some major transactions, including representing Helios Investment Partners in a $1.45 billion initial public offering for Helios Towers, advising on notes for a restructuring of debt owed by German industrial company Galapagos Heat Exchangers.
Additionally, she said, the policy and regulatory practices are "at the very top of the market," and the federal trade practice was busy, considering the activity related to tariffs, sanctions and export controls.
Lobbying is another strong practice in the firm's Washington, D.C., office, she said. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Akin Gump was the nation's leading lobbying firm, billing a total of $42.7 million in 2019.
Additionally, the white-collar criminal defense and congressional investigations practices were engaged in 2019, and she expects that work to continue this year.
As for succession planning, a hot topic throughout the industry, Koopersmith is in her third three-year term. She said the firm is intentional about developing younger lawyers for leadership roles, and recently appointed John Goodgame as partner in charge in Houston, and Trey Muldrow in the same role in New York.
The focus, she said, is training younger lawyers to be leaders, rotating committee memberships, and working to ensure that all partners will grow into important roles for clients. She noted that more than half of the 15 newly promoted partners in 2020 are women.
After a decade of growing revenue—this year's $1.14 billion is 54.2% higher than $736 million in 2010—Koopersmith said the firm is well-positioned for 2020, as it celebrates its 75th anniversary.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanadian Media Giants Sue OpenAI Over Alleged Copyright Violations in ChatGPT Training
3 minute readFormer Head of Finance at DLA Piper and Freshfields Quietly 'Struck Off'
2 minute readAshurst Bolsters Singapore Offering With A&O Shearman Hire
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 12 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
- 2Japan Highlights Burr & Forman Director's 'Body Of Work' With Highest Honor
- 3Unanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
- 4DeSantis Appointed Assistant US Attorney to Broward Circuit Court Bench
- 5Thomson Reuters Plans to Spend Big in AI. Here’s How
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250