A Collision Course With The Courts? UK Lawyers Wary of New Attorney General
Suella Braverman has been vocal about how judges should not determine wider public policy.
February 14, 2020 at 07:29 AM
3 minute read
Boris Johnson's appointment of Suella Braverman as the U.K. government's new Attorney General has raised eyebrows among some in the legal industry given her outspoken views on how the courts should deal with governmental issues.
The resignation of Attorney General Geoffrey Cox led some London lawyers to fear a potential undermining of the rule of law, with one partner questioning "whether somebody will be sent to do a hatchet job on the judiciary".
Braverman's appointment could be seen as controversial given her stance regarding such topics. Earlier this year she argued that "Parliament must retrieve power ceded to another place – the courts", noting that recent Supreme Court decisions in relation to the triggering of Article 50 and the prorogation of Parliament are "chronic and steady encroachment by the judges".
Alexander Campbell, barrister at Field Court Chambers, noted that the appointment is "likely to be a controversial one in the eyes of some parts of the legal profession", adding that "if [she] is set on a collision course with the courts, the legal profession can expect some turbulent times ahead."
"Any dramatic attempt to reform the Human Rights Act will inevitably meet with resistance in parts of the legal profession", Campbell continued.
However, he added it remains to be seen whether Braverman's views will translate into any concrete proposals for reform.
Steve Peers, a professor of EU, human rights and world trade law at the University of Essex, tweeted that it was a "genuinely terrible appointment".
One financial services partner at a transatlantic firm said that the new Attorney General is "well regarded on the legal front". They added: "She has well-known views on Brexit, but that seems to me to be a separate issue."
A private equity partner at a U.K. firm gave the news a "cautious welcome".
"There's a lot of hearsay and many don't think she is up for the job", he said. "Frankly, I will reserve judgment to see whether she upholds the duties and responsibilities of somebody who is meant to represent the legal industry."
The partner continued: "In terms of whether we'll see an all-out assault on the judiciary, who knows?"
Braverman's office did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Continues Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Ted Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Trending Stories
- 1New York’s Equal Rights Amendment Is a Big Deal
- 2Blue-Ribbon Panel Calls for Pay Bumps for NYS Commissioners, But Says No to Lawmakers, Elected Officials
- 3'Outstanding Cooperation': Feds Seek Leniency in Sentencing for Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang
- 4'Grave Matter of Serious Consequences': Why a Missouri Judge Sanctioned a Top Kirkland & Ellis Attorney
- 5Large Group Leaves DLA Piper Affiliate in Brazil to Form New Firm
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250