As US Firms Warily Eye the Big Four, They're Becoming a Force in Asia
Few observers still think of the Big Four accounting firms as the nonconventional fringe players they once were.
February 19, 2020 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Two years ago, the Asian legal market didn't pay much attention to the Big Four accounting firms. Two of them were already here. PwC and EY already had law offices set up in Hong Kong, mainland China and Singapore, arguably the region's most important legal markets. But the accounting firms' Asian legal offerings were limited and appeared mostly to complement the firms' other disciplines, including tax and compliance. For the region's legal establishment, the threat of the Big Four was distant and abstract.
But in just two years, the Big Four have become a force that is penetrating Asia's legal marketing, leaving few observers who still think of them as the nonconventional fringe players they once were.
Since 2018, the Big Four have added five more affiliated law firms in Hong Kong, mainland China and Singapore and revamped at least three of their existing affiliates. Out of the 13 law firms operated by the Big Four in Asia, eight were launched in the past two years. Most recently, in December, KPMG became the last of the group to set up an affiliated law firm in China. With that, all four have set up local law firms in both mainland China and Hong Kong, while all but KPMG have launched Singaporean law firms (PwC and Deloitte also both operate foreign law firms in the city-state).
It isn't just about the quantity of the new offices. In many of the new law firms, the accounting giants recruited from more established local and international firms. The Big Four continue to maintain that they are not interested in directly competing with Big Law, but judging by the lawyers they have hired, they are already part of Big Law in Asia.
The upgrade in Asia kicked into high gear in 2018, when both PwC and EY relaunched their Singaporean law firms and EY significantly expanded its Hong Kong law firm. The Big Four continued their ambitious recruitment efforts in 2019, adding both lawyers and operations executives. In December, EY recruited Singapore-based Asia Pacific legal managed services leader John Knox, a veteran in flexible lawyering services who co-founded one of the Australian predecessor firms of Lawyers on Demand.
On top of that, PwC and KPMG both appointed Big Law veterans in Australia to lead their global legal offerings. Both PwC's Tony O'Malley and KPMG's Stuart Fuller were longtime King & Wood Mallesons partners. Fuller is best known as the Sino-Australian firm's global managing partner and was instrumental in the combination of King & Wood and Mallesons.
Before this, the Big Four's legal operations were often run out of Europe and usually headed by veteran firm partners with a legal background. By bringing on experienced lawyers who have spent most of their careers in professional law firms, the auditors have shown they are serious about moving into Big Law's territory, and by placing them in the Asia-Pacific region they have shown where they want to emphasize that change.
The emphasis is reflected in the firms' financial results. In the fiscal year 2019, PwC's tax and legal revenue hit $10.7 billion, up 6% from the previous year; the remaining three firms all saw tax and legal revenue grow more than 7.5%. Meanwhile, all four reported 9% revenue growth or better in Asia-Pacific, and EY, KPMG and Deloitte each had their strongest regional growth in Asia.
The Big Four aren't done. The leaders of their legal offerings all talk about expanding, hiring more and investing more. Unlike traditional law firms, which continue to struggle in Asia, the Big Four are on a tear, and they are a force to be reckoned with.
Email: [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Walks a Tightrope But Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readLuxembourg Hot, Beijing Not: In Today’s Cutthroat Market, Regions Need a Business Case
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250