Ince's Incoming Senior Partner Unlikely to Join Before May 2021
The firm announced the hire of its new senior partner last September but contractual roadblocks mean it is set to be another 14 months before he joins.
February 19, 2020 at 08:06 AM
3 minute read
Ince Gordon Dadds is set to be left waiting for another 14 months before its senior partner-to-be can join the firm due to stringent exit clauses, several people familiar with the matter have said.
Ince had widely publicised the appointment of Hill Dickinson's global head of shipping Julian Clark as its new senior partner in September last year. However, Clark is subject to non-compete clauses and a notice period that prevents him from joining the AIM-listed firm until May 2021, according to three people close to the situation.
The delay extends Ince's time without a senior partner, which it has lacked since insurance partner Jan Heuvels stepped down from the role six months early in 2018.
Clark is bound by Hill Dickinson's partnership deed, which stipulates a notice period for senior staff comprising the remainder of the financial year in which the notice was tendered, in addition to a further 12 months, according to one person with knowledge of the situation.
In Clark's case, the person added, this would be the eight months from the date he handed in his notice – in September 2019 – to April 30, 2020, with a full 12 months on top of this, bringing his notice end-date to April 30, 2021.
Another person close to the matter said they "hope" Clark will join sooner than May 2021, but a third person said Clark has been unable to obtain a release from his current contract.
One of the people said they expected Hill Dickinson to enforce the lengthy notice period due to Clark—currently on gardening leave—being well-known in the shipping world and a "client winner".
"The firm will want to take a stand and to send a message to existing partners," the person added.
The delay represents the latest setback for Ince, with Law.com's U.K. arm Legal Week last week reporting that the firm's global head of shipping, Faz Peermohamed, was to leave the firm alongside seven other partners, including the firm's insurance, energy, and trade heads.
The listed firm has also struggled to maintain its footing in the AIM, and is confronting a deflated share price that has showed little sign of improving since it nosedived by more than 60% in January.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields' Former Senior Partner Braham Knighted in New Year’s Honours
3 minute readTrio Of Firms Bag Roles In JSW Energy’s $1.5B Acquisition In India
Brazilian Firms Demarest, BMA, TozziniFreire Elevate Lawyers to Partner
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250