Dutch Appeals Court Orders Russia to Pay $50B Award in 'Historic' Yukos Case
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek and Shearman & Sterling represented Yukos shareholders, while Houthoff Buruma, Hanotiau & van den Berg, and White & Case acted for the Russian Federation.
February 21, 2020 at 07:10 AM
3 minute read
The Court of the Appeal of The Hague has dismissed the Russian Federation's application to set aside the $50 billion arbitration award – the largest in history – that the Russian government was ordered to pay by the Hague's Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2014.
The saga is rooted in allegations made over a decade ago that officials had manipulated the legal system to bankrupt the Yukos oil company and jail its boss Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
The decision was handed down on February 18, with the arbitral tribunal sitting in The Hague under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) ruling unanimously that the Russian Federation appropriated the assets of Yukos Oil in violation of international law.
A partner involved in the case told Law.com International that the decision is a "historic victory for the rule of law prevailing over the exercise of illegitimate power in government" and that the court "had not been reticent to explain why Russia is accountable".
The partner continued: "In many ways it's a very important case, because Russia has been held accountable for what the tribunal described as 'illegal expropriation of Yukos'."
Meanwhile, a partner at Shearman & Sterling said the case is a "question about international obligations in states".
"People want to make it a political decision but it's not – it's legal," they added. "From a legal standpoint, the arbitration awards were accurate and in line with international law, and therefore Russia is obliged to respect it."
Acting for the former Yukos majority shareholders was De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, with a team led by arbitration partner Marnix Leijten, and partners Matthias Kuscher and Eelco Meerdink.
Shearman supported De Brauw with a team led by international arbitration head Emmanuel Gaillard and public international law head Yas Banifatemi.
Meanwhile, the Russian Federation was represented by Dutch firms Houthoff Buruma and Hanotiau & van den Berg, with U.S. firm White & Case supporting. The White & Case team was led by London disputes partner David Goldberg, alongside litigation partners Carolyn Lamm and Francis Vasquez in Washington D.C., according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
In a statement by the firm, Shearman's Gaillard said: "This is a landslide victory for our clients. By confirming the Arbitral Tribunal's landmark decisions, The Hague Court of Appeal reinforces the finding that the Russian Federation was bound by its international obligations under the ECT and that it must be held accountable for the largest expropriation in modern history."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers of Color on Working in Big Law in Belgium: 'I'm Experiencing Racism on a Day-to-Day Basis'
11 minute readCrossing the Line? How Law Firms 'Lobby' EU Institutions in the Shadows
13 minute read'They Used Me For a Pitch, Then Excluded Me': How Major Law Firms are Using Their Black Lawyers to Mislead On Diversity
Trending Stories
- 1Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 2Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 3Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 4Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 5In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250