Pro Bono Partner Numbers Rise Globally
The increase in pro bono partners, defined as those who spend 50% or more of their time on pro bono work, has been driven in part by law firms' willingness to treat pro bono work the same way they treat billable work.
February 25, 2020 at 04:01 PM
3 minute read
The number of pro bono partners in law firms around the world has risen sharply over the past two decades as firms strive to demonstrate their commitment to providing legal assistance and access to justice.
According to a new report, there were only six dedicated pro bono partners globally in 1990. As of 2019, however, some 66 pro bono partners were working in more than 55 law firms.
"A key factor increasing pressure on law firms to provide pro bono has been cuts to legal aid, resulting in increased unmet legal need," the report's authors said. The fact that law firms are picking up this shortfall and the importance that they place on this is clearly shown by the increasing numbers of pro bono partners being appointed."
The report, "The Nature and Prevalence of Pro Bono Partner Roles Globally," was published by DLA Piper in conjunction with the Australian Pro Bono Centre, the Pro Bono Institute in Washington, D.C., and the Thomson Reuters Foundation. It found that ensuring pro bono work is treated the same way as billable work, growing and strengthening the pro bono practice, and meeting the expectations of clients and other stakeholders have all been drivers behind the promotion of pro bono partners.
The report describes a dedicated pro bono partner as one who spends 50% or more of their time on pro bono work.
Most firms with pro bono partners are leading global or national firms, although one firm with just 25 partners includes a pro bono partner.
The United States has the largest number of pro bono partners, at more than 30, while the U.K. currently has 10. In Australia, 11 pro bono partners have been appointed in the past decade and the Australian firms Clayton Utz and Gilbert + Tobin each have two dedicated pro bono partners.
Among pro bono partners, 70% have no income-generating practice.
The most commonly cited responsibilities of the pro bono partner include being an advocate for pro bono; generating a pipeline of pro bono work and supervising pro bono work; thought leadership; and acting for pro bono clients.
The pro bono leaders said they also engaged with the firm's commercial clients.
Asked about the benefits of being promoted to pro bono partner, one unnamed respondent told the survey: "The title of partner has provided me with credibility and the ability to convince some of the most reluctant attorneys at the firm (i.e., the other partners) to take pro bono seriously.
"Perhaps even more than that, I think that elevating me to pro bono partner has improved the firm's status in pro bono."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250