Coronavirus Crisis Management
Legal departments in all organization types must be proactive to mitigate the effects of this crisis.
February 26, 2020 at 02:13 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
As the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov, "Covid-19″) spreads at speed beyond Wuhan, China and other Asian economic hubs, to the Middle East, the Americas and Europe, the global community faces worsening economic repercussions and the threat of imminent pandemic. Given its increasing impact on the global supply chain, the economy, and the people who make the world turn, it is less about whether organizations will be affected, and more about when and how?
Legal departments in all organization types must be proactive to mitigate the effects of this crisis.
|What We Are Seeing
Our global clients across the spectrum of industries are facing an almost unprecedented impact or threat to their global operations. Factories in China either remain closed or are working at a fraction of their total capacity, frequently less than 10 percent. Shipping containers are stacking up at ports or are facing rerouting as dock workers stay home. Trucking routes across China are severed due to quarantine measures. Many countries have suspended flights to and from virus-hit regions, reducing air freight capacity. Factories in Vietnam, Thailand, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and the United States are also reducing capacity due to shortages of input parts from China, a trend likely to continue as the crisis continues.
Further, retail, restaurant, and tourism industry are devastated as people stay home to avoid the virus.
Regardless of sector, our global clients are impacted by delayed or aborted corporate transactions (and a general slowdown in M&A and IPO activity in certain regions); sharp decreases in corporate earnings; increasing concerns over commercial viability of contracts; increase in the use of force majeure to cancel orders; cancellation of major public and private sector leisure, cultural and sporting events; and public relations issues.
We have set out below how lawyers in global organizations can implement a thoughtful and streamlined approach to leading through a global public health crisis.
|Legal Risk Emanating From a Public Health Crisis
Global public health crises such as Covid-19 are, thankfully, relatively infrequent—SARS (2003) and the Ebola crisis (2014-2016) are the most recent similar examples—but this can mean that response protocols within organizations receive less attention than those for more frequent crisis types and that companies lack experience in responding to these incidents.
Even the most prepared organizations may face significant challenges managing these events because staff, including lawyers and senior leadership, are unable to work effectively because of remote work protocols or they are unwell, quarantined, or stranded overseas.
As a result of Covid-19, organizations face significant potential legal issues, including:
|- issues arising from the closure (temporary or indefinite) of factories, sites or stores, giving rise to contractual and other disputes;
- workplace health and safety;
- employee grievances related to work and health privacy/data protection matters under local laws;
- increasing travel restrictions;
- a myriad of supply chain risk (including risks associated with air and sea shipping); and
- consumer concern regarding goods/materials originating from virus-hit regions leading to breaches of contract.
If Covid-19 has or might have an impact upon an organization's people or operations, the organization should take swift steps to assemble an incident response team and, where necessary, external legal advisors, to best adapt to the rapidly-developing situation.
|Strategic Leadership Considerations
Employees, customers, and the public all expect competent leadership in tough times. To achieve this, organizations should ensure that they:
- have the policies and protocols in place to promote the health and welfare of their employees and representatives—including appropriate dissemination of key medical information and updates regarding Covid-19 and, where necessary, emergency medical treatment and travel/evacuation protocols;
- activate regular and clear internal reporting channels;
- are able to communicate to clients, customers, and vendors the current status of factories based on localized information;
- deploy business continuity plans throughout their operations—particularly those exposed to supply chain risk or where site closures are required—including increased use of technology to support business function;
- have a clear understanding of the terms of any contracts which are impacted by Covid-19;
- understand local employment and data protection laws with a view to understanding: (i) how to implement protective measures in the workplace; (ii) the potential need to report employee information to local health authorities; and (iii) mandatory quarantines, as well as long-term shutdowns of offices and stores;
- where necessary, maintain key lines of communication with relevant government departments, both home and overseas; and
- deploy public relations and reputation management procedures including internal and external communication protocols—particularly involving social media.
By devising and following a strategic plan that covers these steps, lawyers in affected organizations have the opportunity to lead them through this crisis and to ensure that they are equipped to emerge stronger, more resilient and better prepared for the next unforeseen event.
Lillian Hardy is a Partner at Hogan Lovells in Washington D.C. where she heads the firm's multidisciplinary, global crisis management practice, the HL Crisis Leadership Team. Benjamin Kostrzewa and Byron Phillips are attorneys in the firm's Hong Kong office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250