Women Law Firm Leaders: Cogs in the Machine?
It's tempting to think that women at the helm will make a difference in gender parity in the legal profession.
February 26, 2020 at 11:08 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
I used to think female leaders at major law firms were unusual, almost shocking—like seeing a gazelle gliding across Times Square.
Thankfully, they've become less exotic in the last several years. At a few firms, women have held the top spot long enough to be fixtures, such as Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's Kim Koopersmith and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius' Jami Wintz McKeon. And this year, more women are joining their ranks, including at Ropes & Gray; Kelley Drye & Warren; Boies Schiller Flexner; and Jenner & Block.
It's not quite a critical mass, but change is in the air. So if women are increasingly in charge, shouldn't the pace of progress for gender equality finally kick into high gear?
Expectations are high. Probably too high. Female managers do not contribute to greater gender equality, particularly in earnings, according to a study in the European Sociological Review that analyzed data from nine countries. The bottom line: Female managers are cogs in the machine, not agents of change.
Of course, it's tempting to think that women at the helm will make a difference. The study says we assume female leaders are more empathetic because they've experienced gender discrimination and understand work/life tensions. Plus, female managers "challenge stereotypes about women's ambition and capability."
Women who reach those lofty positions have already beaten the odds, and they have more than enough on their plates as firm leaders, yet we expect them to deliver more than men in the same situation.
Being a boss is fraught, female leaders say. "We are all under pressure to perform," Katya Jestin, Jenner & Block's new co-managing partner, says. "For women leaders, the pressures are greater and more intense."
Female leaders are highly conscious of how others perceive their leadership style, including their likability.
"There are attributes of my style that are likely consistent with gender stereotypes," Julie Jones, chair of Ropes & Gray, says, including promoting teamwork and being a good listener. "But some of my style is not consistent with stereotypes. I can be tough, especially when it comes to performance."
Undoubtedly, female chieftains are a tough, select bunch, so how much do they relate to the women struggling in the ranks? And do they face pressure to deliver for other women?
Candace Beinecke, the grand dame of this crowd, says she didn't feel that pressure when she served as chair of Hughes Hubbard & Reed from 1999 to 2016.
"Hughes Hubbard had a long history of providing opportunities for women, and I don't believe the women at our firm had that in mind for my role," she says.
One of the first female leaders of a major firm, Beinecke says her role was more indirect: "I did hear from many how inspiring it was to see a woman in this leadership position and how helpful it was to have the role model." That said, she adds, "knowing that my career depended on people taking a chance on me when it was not expected made me committed to encouraging that same approach by others."
Some of the younger female leaders take a more proactive approach. "I try to see every decision through the lens of diversity and inclusion, and to help in my small way bridge the opportunity gaps that exist," says Jestin, a former federal prosecutor and parent of three children.
"Women do talk to me about their careers," Natasha Harrison, Boies Schiller's new co-managing partner, says. A British citizen of Greek origin who was the first in her family to attend university, the London-based Harrison says, "I see it all as about challenging the status quo. As a diverse creature myself in terms of gender and background, I feel strongly about this issue." Diversity, Harrison stresses, includes "all types," including economic and social status.
But with all the challenges that Harrison faces (Boies has had a series of partner defections this year), does she need this extra burden to promote equality? Isn't this an unfair expectation that's put upon women?
"I don't think of it as pressure, but rather, opportunity and privilege," she says.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Locks In Its American Dream. But What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250