Coronavirus 'to Boost Litigation and Restructuring Work', Lawyers Say
Supply chains and force majeure exemptions are coming under the spotlight as the virus continues to spread.
February 27, 2020 at 06:28 AM
3 minute read
Top lawyers say that they are expecting a windfall in restructuring and litigation mandates as the global economy continues to be damaged by the ongoing spread of coronavirus.
The virus, officially known as COVID-19, has infected nearly 78,000 people globally, according to the latest statistics from the World Health Organisation. It has also wiped billions of dollars off the global economy by damaging supply chains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen 6.6% since the start of the week.
Restructuring lawyers say that distressed companies could find themselves falling into financial difficulty driven by the effects of coronavirus, which is affecting supply chains and the sale of goods coming out of China.
One restructuring lawyer said: "The great unknown is that if [the virus] really does continue seriously for the next quarter, it will really start to impact on retail supply, which is long-leaded by nine months."
The lawyer added: "I think that even if [coronavirus] ended tomorrow, there will still be a fallout that will keep the international firms busy. The winners from this will be those with the restructuring and litigation skill set, the losers will be M&A."
Kirkland & Ellis restructuring partner Kon Asimacopoulos said in a post on LinkedIn: "While the GDP impact of the coronavirus was at first only anticipated to impact the Chinese economy, that is now clearly incorrect. The economic tentacles of COVID-19 are reaching far and wide, and it is obvious the longer it takes to contain, the worse it will be."
Litigators also cite a dwindling supply chain coming out of China as increasing the likelihood of businesses invoking force majeure exemptions if they are unable to fulfil contracts.
Litigation specialists Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan issued an update to clients last week about the possible impact of coronavirus on litigation, saying that contracts signed prior to the coronavirus outbreak could arguably be covered by the Force Majeure clause. This is because the spread of the virus was outside of the affected party's control and neither of the companies could have foreseen it.
Corporate lawyers have added that they are concerned about a potential slowdown in M&A activity as businesses divert their attentions away from strategic takeover opportunities, instead looking to set straight any problems caused by the virus outbreak.
Law firms have leapt into action to keep abreast of the spread of the virus in key locations such as Mainland China, where firms have issued new guidance to employees about working from home and office closures, and Italy, with firms such as Bird & Bird and Italian firm BonelliErede limiting staff movement following reports of an outbreak in the north of the country.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHogan Lovells and Burges Salmon Secure Lead Roles in Largest Ever UK Defence Ministry Contract
2 minute readLatham, Cleary, Clifford Chance Help Middle East Sovereign Wealth Funds Monetise Assets
3 minute read‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Big Four Firm’s Legal Arm Entering the US
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250