Slater and Gordon's Losses Narrow; Revenue Rises
Firm chair James MacKenzie said he is pleased with the half-year results but added that the firm will "still have more to do."
February 27, 2020 at 01:17 PM
3 minute read
Publicly traded Australian class action plaintiff firm Slater and Gordon recorded a small net loss in its financial first half, although revenue rose.
The firm, which acquired U.K. firm Quindell in 2015, reported a net loss of A$516,000 (US$338,000) for the six months to Dec. 31, compared with a loss of A$10.3 million (US$6.75 million) in the same six months a year earlier, Slater and Gordon said in a statement.
Total revenue and other income from continuing operations was A$89.2 million (US$58.4 million), compared with A$75.1 million (US$49 million) the year before.
"While the FY20 Half Year Results are another pleasing step and are a result of the effort of all of our people, we still have more to do," chair James MacKenzie said in a statement. "Slater & Gordon has a clear strategy and a clear vision for the future and it is the commitment to that by the company's board, management and staff that is continuing to drive improvement."
The acquisition of Quindell—now renamed Watchstone—for £637 million ($820 million) in 2015 ended badly, and Slater and Gordon reported a A$1 billion (US$655 million) loss in 2016.
The following year, Slater and Gordon sued Quindell, alleging that "it was induced to make the acquisition by fraudulent representations," particularly regarding the "dilution rates" of cases handled by the division.
Watchstone denied that there was any fraud on its part and that any representations it made regarding the transaction "were honest statements of opinion as to what could happen in the future."
In a counterclaim lodged last year, Watchstone argued that Slater and Gordon and its investment bank Greenhill—which advised the firm on its purchase but is not a defendant in the case—"established a 'back-channel' with PwC, Quindell's trusted adviser, by a series of secret meetings … at which it unlawfully obtained information pertaining to Quindell which was, and which it knew to be, confidential".
Slater and Gordon was the first law firm in the world to list on the share market in 2007.
READ MORE:
Slater and Gordon to sue over Quindell acquisition
Slater & Gordon Hit By Claims of Conspiracy and Breach of Confidence in £637M Dispute
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250