MIPIM: Firms Doubtful Over Attending Rescheduled Event
Several heads of real estate at leading law firms have expressed concern over the rescheduling of the event, which was moved to June in light of coronavirus fears.
March 05, 2020 at 05:37 AM
3 minute read
Several property lawyers who had planned to attend international real estate conference MIPIM have expressed concern over the rescheduling of the event.
The conference was originally billed to take place in Cannes, Southern France, between March 10 and 13. However, Coronavirus fears prompted many attendees to pull out, leading organisers to reschedule the event to early June.
Norton Rose Fulbright and Morrison & Foerster were among the firms to have pulled out of the event, while Reed Smith and Pinsent Masons said they were considering their positions.
CMS, the only law firm sponsoring the event and one of the law firms slated to attend, said it was "monitoring the situation closely and still considering our position."
But several lawyers who were still due to attend told Legal Week, the U.K. arm of Law.com International, that they were rethinking their attendance in light of the change.
One head of real estate at a large international firm said that it "might have been easier for the event to be cancelled altogether this year" as rescheduling it is an "inconvenience" for their real estate team.
The partner said all 30 lawyers on their team who were meant to attend now have to consider rearranging their diaries around the event, and push back scheduled trips and meetings with clients.
The partner also said that they remain "skeptical that the virus will no longer be a threat by June", adding that if things get worse, clients might still back out of the event in June which could lead law firms to do so too, or for the organisers to cancel the event at the last minute.
As a result, the partner said the real estate team at their firm is still unsure whether it will attend. The partner also expressed concern over being able to book hotel rooms for their team as June is the start of a prime season for tourism in Cannes.
A head of real estate at another firm said that while the rescheduling of the event would be a "great opportunity to meet clients who do attend", reorganising their team's diary for June will be a "logistical nightmare".
The partner added the rescheduling could double the costs for their 20-lawyer team to attend as they need to cancel their current transportation and hotel bookings, and book new flights and hotel rooms for June.
For another real estate head at a third firm, the rescheduling was "disruptive" and "slowing the momentum of deals" as lawyers need to reschedule their own client meetings.
The partner added that it was costly to their firm, especially in terms of flight bookings. The partner said that some of the practice's 50 lawyers attending the event, some from as far afield as Australia and the U.S., had already made holiday plans for June that now have to be rescheduled for the event.
However, another head of real estate at another law firm saw a silver-lining to the disruption, saying: "On the bright side, I've got the free-est week ever next week, it feels like a bank holiday!"
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250