Knock, Knock? Why the Legal 'Front Door' Will be the Big Theme For In-House Legal Departments in 2020
Deloitte Legal's Bruce Braude and Tim Wistow argue that businesses are increasingly turning to technological solutions to present a legal front door to the firm itself.
March 10, 2020 at 08:13 AM
6 minute read
Both legal service providers and in-house functions have shown an increased interest in legal technology over the last decade. The former have tended to use technology to improve service delivery internally whilst, externally, client-facing portals and new online services have been introduced with the aim of enhancing the client experience.
For the majority of in-house legal departments, the implementation of new technologies has tended to focus on improving the overall function. In these instances, the technology has typically included aspects like e-billing solutions, to better understand and manage legal spend, as well as matter management platforms and contract lifecycle management tools to oversee contractual processes and obligations.
Aside from a few exceptions, there has been little focus to date by in-house legal functions on their clients' experience of legal processes. This is now changing, and GCs and Legal COOs are increasingly turning their attention to the 'legal front door'.
If a front door acts as the main entrance to a house, then a 'legal front door' plays a similar role in being the primary way for a business to access its legal department. In essence, it is a platform that enables business users to log legal requests with the in-house legal department, but it can encompass a lot more.
Self-service examples include Frequently Asked Questions, intelligent systems and bots for answering queries, contract generation and even access to the organisation's contract repository and associated contractual obligations.
Whilst some have been using the legal front door for years, for many in-house legal departments it is still an emerging trend. In both cases, businesses are now exploring its various technologies, which may range from using existing corporate intranet platforms, legal matter management platforms with built-in service request portals or existing help-desk type tools.
Opportunity knocks…
There are a number of problems and opportunities that the front door concept seeks to address but there are also clear benefits, regardless of what side of the 'door' you are on.
In an increasingly digitised and 'always on' world, business users often want to access their company's lawyer as quickly as possible. Indeed, rather than simply resorting to sending an email or trying to get hold of them on the telephone, users want immediate service.
A legal front door system will enable them to log requests through a self-service portal, with minimal effort and human interaction. This will help resolve issues faster, resulting in obvious productivity and resourcing benefits.
The adoption of a portal also has the ability to provide business users with data transparency, using real-time status information on their legal requests. This is in contrast to users' experiences to date, which can be opaque, confusing and therefore less efficient.
There are also a number of benefits for in-house legal departments, not least due to the fact that a legal front door that includes self-service elements will free up lawyers' time so that they can focus attention on more complex issues rather than having to deal with routine queries.
Additionally, the front door acts as a filter, meaning that requests can be properly captured and directed to the most appropriate individual within the legal team. This is far more efficient than manually having to pass requests to the right person.
Perhaps the most significant benefit, however, is around how the front door allows for detailed information to be captured and analysed relating to the legal requests in the business. Such valuable information can be used to improve the service and identify trends and emerging legal risks facing the business.
This in turn will help GCs and legal teams inform C-suite colleagues to make appropriate, insight-led business decisions, further demonstrating the value that the legal department brings to the business.
The efficiency opportunities are apparent when looking at how similar portals have benefited other industries. In one front door implementation undertaken by Deloitte for a global retailer's HR function, 20% of service interactions were able to be resolved with no human involvement.
In another case, a 25% increase in service request volume was able to be handled with no increase in team size. These are considerable savings that can be translated through to a legal function with relative ease.
Getting a foot in the door
Whether using existing platforms within the organisation, or adopting entirely new technology, there are a number of business factors that need to be considered before getting the keys to the legal front door.
A key consideration will be the platform's functionality: will it be used for simply logging requests or will it include more sophisticated self-service elements? Understanding what data that the platform will capture and how it can be effectively analysed will be particularly important.
In addition, internal communication and education sessions will certainly be required in order to get buy-in from employees who will be using the system regularly and may be reluctant to change. A phased roll-out may be required to smooth any teething problems, and so certain parts of the business will need to be prioritised.
Fundamentally, it is worth remembering that the implementation of any new technology into an organisation can be make-or-break depending on how 'useable' it is, particularly if it integrates with other platforms and systems that the business already uses.
Adopting a legal front door will be a defining trend of the next few years for in-house legal. It has the potential to significantly enhance the service experience that a business receives from its legal department, evolve the legal department to become more insight-led within the business and deliver material improvements in service levels and efficiency.
It also has the potential to contribute to the data-oriented approach to managing the legal department, most likely already underway with the various in-house legal management technologies discussed above.
Bruce Braude and Tim Wistow are CTO and legal technology consultant at Deloitte Legal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPallas Partners Founder On the Disputes Trends to Look Out For in 2025
4 minute readWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250