Brazilian Bar Chapter Shutters São Paulo Seminar on U.S. Law
The bar association warned participating lawyers of possible fines or jail for providing legal advice without first registering as foreign legal advisers.
March 11, 2020 at 04:46 PM
4 minute read
The São Paulo branch of the Brazilian bar association forced the cancellation last week of a seminar on U.S. law that was to be given by U.S.-based attorneys because those attorneys weren't registered in the country as foreign legal advisers.
The Order of Brazilian Attorneys in São Paulo warned March 6 that providing legal advice without registering as a foreign legal adviser could result in fines or even incarceration.
Furthermore, the group said that registered foreign legal advisers are forbidden from holding marketing events and educational seminars aimed at capturing clients in Brazil. They said a representative of the local chapter of the bar association, Ivan Rafael Bueno, personally delivered the message and explained the "seriousness" of the situation.
The event organizers opted to cancel.
Pressure to nix the seminar demonstrates that Brazil's legal industry is pushing for more stringent enforcement of the boundaries that foreign lawyers must observe when operating in Brazil. At the national level, the Brazilian bar association said in January that it would look more closely at how foreign law firms conduct themselves in the country following multiple complaints that global firms appeared to be providing prohibited advice on Brazilian law.
The Order of Brazilian Attorneys allows non-Brazilian firms to advise on legal matters in their home countries but expressly forbids foreign law firms from consulting on Brazilian law even if they do so in conjunction with Brazilian members of the bar association. Foreign attorneys must register to conduct business with the association, which grants authorizations on a discretionary basis.
Brian Barakat, a Miami-based attorney and former prosecutor who was scheduled to speak about legal protections and litigation options for foreign investors in Florida, said he plans to now apply to become a foreign legal consultant in Brazil.
"If that's their regulation, then we're very happy to comply with it," he said by phone from Coral Gables, Florida.
Barakat had already traveled to São Paulo when the seminar aimed at individual investors was canceled. He finds the stipulation that international lawyers register as foreign legal consultants completely reasonable.
"Once they explained, we understood completely," he said.
A flyer for the event promised to explain the ins-and-outs of contentious legal disputes in the American justice system so that Brazilian investors could protect their investments in real estate, businesses and even publicly traded securities. It was to be held at Hotel Unique, a trendy hotel in the upscale Jardim Paulista neighborhood.
Others scheduled to appear included Alexandre Piquet, an attorney with offices in Miami and New York who specializes in helping international clients establish business and legal residence in the U.S., and Chase Carlson, a Miami-based attorney who focuses on investment fraud litigation. Neither Piquet nor Carlson responded to requests for comment.
Difficult economic conditions have propelled more Brazilians to migrate to the U.S. in recent years, while concerns for personal safety have also motivated some to leave Latin America's largest economy. Many of these Brazilians have settled in South Florida.
Brazil's consul general in Miami, Adalnio Senna Ganem, estimated three years ago that 300,000 Brazilians live in Florida — constituting the largest Brazilian community in any state of the country.
In addition, Florida serves as a gateway for Brazilian companies and products into the North American market. Bilateral trade between Brazil and the U.S. topped $34 billion in 2018.
Those economic ties provide a compelling case for South Florida-based attorneys to do business in Brazil.
"We plan to return as soon as we have complied with the bar's regulations," Barakat. said.
|
Read More
Brazilian Bar Association Warns Global Firms Not to Overstep by Advising on Local Law
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250