Damage Limitation: How the Virus Outbreak is Shaping Deal Work
Partners are having to adapt to a growing caution among clients, which is taking its toll on transactional work.
March 13, 2020 at 09:16 AM
4 minute read
As fears over the spread of COVID-19 mount across the globe, law firms are under pressure to reassess how they approach deal work, with coronavirus concerns now topping the list of priorities in a range of transactions.
For the past month, law firms have been introducing measures in a bid to stem the outbreak and protect staff. But as the virus continues to take hold, partners at major law firms have told Law.com International that growing caution among clients is changing how they deliver advice. The potential impact of the virus is now eclipsing routine commercial advice, delaying deals and bill payments, and leading law firms to channel resources towards damage limitation.
Changing client attitudes
As of March 12, there have been over 126,000 confirmed cases of coronavirus across 125 countries, more than 4,500 of whom have died, according to the latest data published by the World Health Organization.
With the numbers climbing each day, one partner observes how client attitudes to transactions have changed starkly since the outbreak started in January.
Whereas two months ago clients "were conscious but not too worried", the partner says that they are now "taking it seriously" and have been "asking for much more contingency planning and guidance" from their legal advisers.
Client calls previously scheduled for advice about the intricacies of deals have "now turned into contingency planning calls" as transactions are either put on hold, or falling through entirely due to market volatility.
The partner added that, once the situation stabilises, clients will "expect lawyers to do damage control" for them, such as preparing to raise capital in a bid to repair their balance sheets, or preparing for potential insolvencies.
A private equity partner at another firm suggested that, while most of his China-based clients have postponed deals due to the outbreak, there was a "genuine belief that they can control the virus" and therefore are regaining confidence and will continue pursuing investment opportunities.
However, in contrast, the partner said American clients' attitudes have heightened. He added that one of his clients, an American private equity house, asked his team to "certify in writing" that none of the lawyers on his team had travelled to country at risk in the past couple of weeks.
Though the virus has forced a physical distance between lawyers and their clients, some partners are sympathetic to client worries, with one calling them "common sense".
One partner however lacked sympathy for the worsening pandemic, claiming: "It's just a cold, people should just get over it."
Stunted earnings
Partners also warned of the long term impact the virus could have on law firms' financials and lawyers' earnings in view of a curbed deal flow.
As the virus causes significant volatility in the market, one partner says some clients are "thinking harder" and "more cautiously" about their business decisions, which is in turn causing transactions to "take longer" to go through and, consequently, longer for lawyers to get paid.
A partner and head of energy at a U.K. law firm added: "The virus will render the most financially vulnerable law firms even more vulnerable because clients will take longer to pay the bills."
He added that the most vulnerable might have to "rely on their cash balances" to get through the economic difficulty brought about by the outbreak.
But not everyone expects to lose out. The restructuring and litigation markets expect to see an up-tick in work, with lawyers in those areas likely to bill more as a result.
The recent anxieties come as law firms impose preemptive measures to halt the risk of exposing their lawyers, staff and clients to the virus. Some firms, including Baker McKenzie in London, closed their offices temporarily, while others cancelled events - including annual partners' conferences – and restricted travel.
Read More
Taylor Wessing Confirms Positive Virus Case In London, Closes Office
King & Wood Mallesons, Norton Rose Fulbright, Jones Day Send Sydney Staff Home on Coronavirus Fears
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Merricks-Mastercard Fallout: ‘Defendants Will Be Rubbing Their Hands with Glee’
‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
- 2Houston-Based Law Firm Overcomes Defamation Suit for Website Warning
- 3The Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek
- 4Big Law Partner Co-Launches Startup Aiming to Transform Fund Formation Process
- 5How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250