Cum-Ex Trading Scheme Was Illegal, German Court Says
Two British traders were handed suspended prison sentences, while millions are to be recovered from the banks.
March 19, 2020 at 10:46 AM
3 minute read
A German court has handed two British traders suspended sentences, in a first-of-its kind judgment that followed the criminal case at the centre of the major cum-ex fraud scandal.
The case goes to the heart of the ongoing cum-ex scandal, in which high profile banks were found to have claimed twice on tax rebates, costing Germany several billions.
The court previously stated that the tax evasion scheme was not permitted under German tax law, but it had not ruled on the question of whether it was a criminal matter. Yesterday's ruling, however, delivers a decisive blow to the defendants in the case.
Bonn district court handed the two traders suspended sentences of 22 months and 12 months. It also ordered one of the traders to repay €14 million of the money he made from the trades in question. Meanwhile, the private bank M. M. Warburg & Co was told to repay €176.5 million.
The ruling sets a foundation for a number of pending trials in which Germany will attempt to recover millions of euros from banks and investors.
Warburg said in a statement that it is probing all legal remedies in this matter. An appeal of the ruling to the German Federal High Court is possible.
On Tuesday, the court said it would truncate the trail in view of the coronavirus outbreak that has rocked the world.
Travel bans associated with the spread of the virus would have made the continuing participation of the two British defendants in the trial difficult and might have stretched the trial by a number of weeks, a spokesman for the court told Law.com International.
In September, the two London-based bankers, known Martin S and Nicholas D, stood before the court charged with spearheading the transactions between 2006 to 2011. The trial was the first in a wider investigation that seeks to recover billions of euros from banks that took part in so-called cum-ex schemes, whereby banks claimed twice on tax rebates. Germany has said the schemes have cost its taxpayers €5 billion.
The scandal has since plunged a number of major law firms into suspicion of misconduct and, worse, criminal wrongdoing, including Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, whose global head of tax, Ulf Johannemann, was arrested in November.
Earlier this month, Clifford Chance's Frankfurt office was raided by German authorities seeking files on a banking client caught up in the saga, while in December, co-managing partner of DLA Piper Germany stepped down amid revelations of his potential ties to the matter.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
South Africa Regulator’s Staffing Problems Leave High-Stakes M&A Deals in Limbo
4 minute readGerman Court Finds Facebook Must Pay Users for Data Breach, But Less Than Expected
Singapore Tycoon Loses Suit Against HSBC, Sentenced To Prison On Forgery Charges
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong's High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
- 2'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
- 3People in the News—Nov. 19, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Duane Morris
- 4Court System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
- 5Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250