Orrick to Pull Up Stakes in Hong Kong as Asia Strategy Shifts
The firm sought to refocus its efforts in the Asian financial hotspot after it lost a large capital markets team in 2017. But the desired growth never materialized.
March 19, 2020 at 12:00 AM
3 minute read
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe is shuttering its Hong Kong office at the end of August, three years after overhauling its strategy for the Asian financial hotbed.
After losing the bulk of its Hong Kong capital markets team in early 2017, the firm aimed to rebuild its presence in the city by focusing on attorneys who could complement its global strengths in technology and innovation along with several other key sectors. But CEO Mitch Zuklie said the firm failed to achieve the growth that it sought.
"There's a lot of international firms in Hong Kong, the China-based firms are increasingly competitive, and we just don't think that—while our team was strong—we were able to penetrate the market with the same success we've had in other markets, including those in Asia."
The firm retains Asian offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Taipei and Tokyo.
Zuklie said the firm had evaluated the issue for over a year and made the decision to close the office well before COVID-19 emerged from Wuhan, China, in January. The outbreak prompted the firm to postpone the announcement, but with the firm's lease in Hong Kong expiring in June, a public announcement became necessary.
"We're glad to see that many firms have reopened in Hong Kong," Zuklie added.
The firm intends to secure temporary space to support lawyers and clients in a longer transition.
Orrick's Hong Kong team currently consists of four partners and seven other lawyers and trainees with expertise in private investment funds, regional M&A and local disputes. There are also 10 support staffers.
"They are high-quality people, and I expect to see them come aboard in other firms that are investing in Hong Kong," Zuklie said.
Orrick first entered Hong Kong in 2005 by taking over a legacy Coudert Brothers office in the city following the latter's dissolution. The next year, the firm began building out its capital markets team with the hire of Edwin Luk from O'Melveny & Myers. But when Luk, who had served as the firm's global head of capital markets, and a team of eight other partners decamped for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius in January 2017, the firm made the decision to exit the practice and pivot to a focus on its three core industry sectors: tech, energy and infrastructure, and finance.
Zuklie remains bullish on Orrick's wider presence in Asia, emphasizing its intellectual property practice in China, the firm's M&A efforts in the region, and work on CFIUS reviews of foreign investment in the U.S.
And the firm retains an interest in Singapore, which has been the case since Zuklie took the reins in 2013.
"It's significant for energy and infrastructure, international arbitration, and tech, and it's a gateway to Southeast Asia," he said. "It's a market we're paying close attention to."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTribunal Dismisses AML Case Against Kennedys’ Chief Risk Officer, But Ex-Partner Fined
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
2 minute readDLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250