Mayer Brown's Efforts to Reopen in Hong Kong Backtracked After Employees Raise Concerns
Mayer Brown's earlier decision to reopen its Hong Kong office was met with criticism from some employees as the number of cases of the coronavirus began to spike again in the region. The firm reinstated its work-from-home policy Monday.
March 24, 2020 at 07:34 PM
4 minute read
A letter sent to Mayer Brown management in Hong Kong that criticized the firm for the way it has handled issues related to the coronavirus pandemic illustrates the heightened level of concern among employees as businesses and law firms in Hong Kong try to come back from their work-from-home policies.
The letter, sent anonymously and seen by Law.com International, specifically addresses Mayer Brown's policy, which has since been rescinded, calling for lawyers and staff to return to work in the Hong Kong office unless they have permission from their supervisor to continue to work from home. That policy has been in place for a few weeks, but the letter was written Sunday as the number of cases in the region spiked.
"You are putting us, our families and our communities at risk for no good reason," the letter's authors wrote.
Mayer Brown responded in a statement, however, that it quickly reinstated its work-from-home policy Monday, the day after the letter was written and as reports of cases spiking made their way into the news.
The letter, delivered to the firm over the weekend, was sent as Hong Kong's efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 have begun to backslide. The city had managed to stave off a runaway outbreak of the deadly virus in part because the public has been diligent about wearing face masks, washing hands and maintaining social distancing. But in the last week, the number of confirmed cases has almost doubled as Hong Kong residents who had left for North America and Europe began to return, bringing the virus back with them. As of Wednesday, Hong Kong will attempt to stop the number of new cases by banning all non-Hong Kong residents from entering the country.
The issues raised in the letter also portend scenarios that could arise in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere when restrictions are lifted and firms attempt to return to normal.
The letter blasted Mayer Brown for telling lawyers and staff that they should return to work in the office. It also said the firm had failed to provide any support to those employees who had children at home. Hong Kong's schools have been closed during the crisis and are not expected to reopen until late April.
"We want to express our dismay at the position the firm continues to maintain in the face of a global pandemic. You insist that we still come to work despite a grand majority of other Hong Kong firms, companies and government offices providing the option for employees to work from home," the letter said.
Mayer Brown said in a statement that the Hong Kong office returned to a full voluntary work-from-home policy Monday.
The firm said that as the COVID-19 crisis spread to Hong Kong from the mainland, it enacted a work-from-home policy in Hong Kong that continued until mid-February. However, when many government agencies and businesses in Hong Kong, including law firms, began resuming operations in their offices, it did as well.
The statement noted that conditions in Hong Kong deteriorated rapidly. "The health and safety of our people—each and every one of us— takes priority over everything else and is the only factor in play as our local leaders react in real time to a rapidly unfolding global human tragedy," the firm said.
Mayer Brown spokesman John Tuerck also confirmed Hong Kong press reports that an employee of the Hong Kong office has tested positive for COVID-19 and has been hospitalized—one of 39 new confirmed cases added Monday. He said the employee had not been in the Hong Kong office since early March.
Mayer Brown has approximately 200 lawyers based in Hong Kong, according to the firm's website.
Lisa Shuchman contributed to this story
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Solicitors Regulator Sets Unusual Practice Conditions on AIG In-House Lawyer
Insurance Practice DWF Takes Team of 53 Lawyers From Australian Firm
2 minute readA&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter
3 minute readResolute Mining Appoints London General Counsel—CEO Resigns Following Foreign Detention
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250