Virgin Management Introduces Gender Targets For Relationship Firms
"We're conscious of the poor female partner statistics in the industry", said Robert Blok.
March 25, 2020 at 07:13 AM
3 minute read
Virgin Management group legal director Robert Blok has introduced gender targets for the law firms the company works with, in order to promote diversity at senior levels.
Blok has called for firms to ensure that at least one partner in their relationship teams is a woman, telling Law.com International's U.K. arm Legal Week that he wants the groups to be "more reflective of the gender balance in our own teams at Virgin Management".
"We're conscious of the poor female partner statistics in the industry", he added. "In relation to gender, we have seen some firms deal far better with flexible working than others".
Blok said that if a law firm cannot immediately comply with the new request, Virgin Management would "work with them to make it work":
"Bringing on board a partner in the relationship team can often be an iterative process as you need the relationship with the individuals to gel properly. So this just adds an additional dimension," he added.
Improving gender representation continues to be a priority for the in-house community. Most recently, Swiss pharmaceutical company Novartis stated that it will withhold 15% of billed time if its refreshed set of advisers do not comply with its diversity and inclusion requirements.
Elsewhere, GCs continue to focus on diversity when tendering for panel appointments, with Hannah Hullah, GC at John Lewis, telling Legal Week last year that "eyebrows would be raised if a law firm turned up to a pitch with a team of white middle-class men."
Mental health is also increasingly on the agenda for general counsel, with some keeping a closer eye on lawyers recording unsocial hours.
In-house lawyers are also looking at mental health when it comes to their panel firms. Crown Estate general counsel Rob Booth told Legal Week last month that he "calls out" his panel firms if lawyers are recording unsocial hours.
Blok said: "We ask about billing targets and openly don't like them, but our ability to influence them is limited. It's problematic from a client's point of view, because it can drive people to a place where they work too hard."
"We've seen situations where pressures on lawyers have resulted in health issues", he added. "That's highly concerning, so as a client you need to be conscious of the effect your demands may have."
Read More:
Crown Estate GC 'Calling Out' Lawyers for Working Late
General Counsel Role Increasingly Now A 'Sales Job', Says Luton Airport's GC
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrio of Firms Act On Chinese Insurer Ping An's $1.7B Stake Acquisition In Healthcare Arm
King & Spalding’s Merger Marks Key Move in Saudi Arabia’s Legal Surge
3 minute readRBG Holdings Suspends Trading After Weeks of Internal Strife and Financial Struggles
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250