The Most Helpful COVID-19 Advice, According to GCs
Firms should work together, providing more digestible bulletins and focus on contractual resilience, say heads of legal.
March 26, 2020 at 08:55 AM
5 minute read
Law firms should be providing more digestible coronavirus advice and should consider working together and channeling efforts into pro-bono initiatives during such turbulent times, U.K. general counsel believe.
The COVID-19 global pandemic has seen law firms rush to produce bulletins, webinars and taskforces. But speaking to Law.com International's U.K. arm, Legal Week, Sam Ross, general counsel at ComplyAdvantage, said there is almost no time to read the detailed bulletins being published by law firms. He thinks that a more digestible format would be beneficial for users.
"Different times warrant different thinking."
"Perhaps the bulletins could be done as podcasts" he suggests. "Or having things on one page rather than too long. Law firms should keep it simple."
Pointing to how supermarkets are now working together against the backdrop of relaxed competition laws, Ross also thinks law firms could "work together rather than having 12 separate bulletins", as "different times warrant different thinking". He adds that it would be useful for firms to "band together" and decide who will provide which updates.
Ross also said that another missing offering is free template documents, such as standard documents to deal with common issues. While these would be "incredibly useful", he suggests this is something that GCs and law firms can work together on.
"What GCs need in a crisis is not generic marketing but trusted adviser relationships which help their businesses make decisions that are often not about the law but about doing the right thing for that business and its stakeholders."
For Edward Walker, former interim general counsel at Vivo Energy, the coronavirus is being used as "an opportunity to market" on social media. He highlighted the example of the numerous law firm posts on LinkedIn advertising their COVID-19 specific services.
He said "that what GCs need in a crisis is not generic marketing but trusted adviser relationships which help their businesses make decisions that are often not about the law but about doing the right thing for that business and its stakeholders".
He added it can be difficult to hear sensible advice from trusted advisers amid all the generic marketing noise.
"GCs don't need to know detailed law, they need someone to spar with about what the right thing to do is. It's about deeper values", he continued.
But law firms should not limit themselves to solely advising clients and should set newer, refreshed targets based on less insular thinking.
ComplyAdvantage's Sam Ross added he would like to see law firms doubling down on pro bono efforts. "For example, a free webinar for self-employed people would be really impressive."
"If law firms do have less work, they should use their time to of course look after their family and friends, but also to use their legal skills to help the most vulnerable".
One head of legal in the construction sector said that the "speed and multi-faceted nature of this crisis will test business' major incident response plans and disaster management capability". As such, short-term legal responses will include "analysing the macro picture by mapping contractual terms onto an economic prediction" while a medium term issue will be triaging issues with customers and suppliers.
The head of legal predicts "a lot of litigation about contractual interpretation and the like", and would ask firms to "be at the forefront of this to understand contractual resilience against pandemics". "In time, many businesses will probably need a bail out and there will no doubt be tricky legal issues in all that", they said.
Because the situation is so extreme, will GCs really spend £20,000 on a law firm? Or will they just pick up the phone to the person on the other side of the contract to come up with a solution?
Another general counsel of a fintech business questioned whether there is necessarily a huge opportunity for law firms. "There's the obvious advice they can give on force majeure", they say. "But because the situation is so extreme, will GCs really spend £20,000 on a law firm? Or will they just pick up the phone to the person on the other side of the contract to come up with a solution?"
"Trust is a big part here", they add. "So if law firms do advise on contracts and their terms, it should be practical advice first".
Read More:
Magic Circle Duo Act as UK Government Offers Businesses COVID-19 Financial Relief
Big Four Legal Arm Head Says COVID-19 Will Change the Way Law is Practiced
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Racial Discrimination Complaint Triggered South African IT Probe
4 minute readHogan Lovells Takes Partner Quartet, Hiring from Dechert, Ashurst in Singapore
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250