Macfarlanes Fails to Make Dent in Gender Pay Gap, Reveals Ethnicity Figures
Last year, the firm measured the largest combined pay gap of its U.K. Top 50 peers.
March 27, 2020 at 05:49 AM
3 minute read
Macfarlanes' high gender pay gap remains essentially unchanged on last year, according to its latest figures.
The firm has posted a combined partner and employee gender pay gap figure of 75.02%, down just 0.24% compared to its 2018 snapshot figure. Last year, the firm's combined pay gap figure was the largest of its U.K. Top 50 peers.
In its report, the firm attributed the pay gap to "higher levels of remuneration received by partners compared to the rest of the firm," as well as "the low number of female and particularly senior female partners".
It added that the firm had 84 partners during the 2018-19 financial year —12 female and 72 male.
For the firm's employees excluding partners, the gender pay gap stood at 16%, down from 17% last year.
The firm also reported its ethnicity pay gap for the first time, measuring a 69% ethnicity pay gap for the entire firm, including partners.
On a partnership-only basis, the firm measured a negative pay gap of 15%, though just 1% of its partnership is made up of people from a Black, Asian or minority ethnic background.
In comparison, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner recently reported a 26% ethnicity pay gap for all employees, while its BAME partners — who make up just under 10% of the total partnership — earned on average 21% more than their white colleagues.
In the report, Macfarlanes' managing partner Julian Howard said: "Our gender and ethnicity pay gaps highlight an imbalance in our most senior roles. We are working hard to be a place which supports everyone to develop their career in line with their aspirations. We believe that diverse teams make better decisions and therefore provide a better service to our clients.
"While our overall figures appear relatively unchanged, we are committed to long-term change. Initiatives such as the female lawyers forum and the BME and male lawyers roundtables are also generating feedback and ideas to help us to continue to develop a workplace in which everyone feels that they belong."
|Read more
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250