Lawyers Fear Billing Delays, Bonus Drops and Job Cuts Amid Virus Panic
Lawyers predict that their firms will need to prioritise cash retention in the coming months.
March 30, 2020 at 07:09 AM
5 minute read
U.K. lawyers fear that the coronavirus pandemic will have a major impact on firm's financial positions due to the likelihood of lengthening lock-up, as clients struggle to maintain their own supplier commitments.
In a survey of 60 top lawyers by Law.com International's U.K. arm, Legal Week, roughly twice as many respondents said firms' lock-up – the time it takes between advising clients and being paid – will be lengthened, as opposed to those who said there would be no major effect.
One respondent said that the payment of legal fees "will be low on the priority list for some clients", as they grapple with the challenges faced by their own businesses.
Smith & Williamson head of professional practices Giles Murphy agreed, and told Legal Week that clients will be likely prioritising paying other suppliers, such as IT, who are being relied upon to keep organisations running on a daily basis.
Speaking about the potential impact of the pandemic on the legal sector, Murphy said that the starting point for the industry's concerns around lock-up stems from the low amount of cash kept within legal businesses.
"If there is any cash to spare," he says, "It gets paid out to partners as soon as possible. And that's an absolutely fine thing to do in an easy, predictable economy like the one we've had recently. But even last summer we were thinking about the potential impact of things like the U.K. general election and Brexit being a jolt to the [economic] system.
"Of course, not even we predicted a virus pandemic, but that's exactly the type of jolt we thought firms would have to deal with sooner or later. There are currently a lot of firms with cash on their balance sheet that is less than the balance they need to pay wages."
Analysis published by Legal Week and compiled by Smith & Williamson last year showed that at the end of the 2018 financial year, the top 50 U.K. law firms were waiting to be paid a total of £5.6 billion in unpaid client invoices between them. This left them with only about £450 million in net cash, when bank loans and overdrafts were taken away from cash balance.
Over the same period, clients took on average 121 days to pay U.K. top 50 firms.
Another survey respondent said that they expect there to be a reasonably large impact on their lock-up as clients view law firms as low-priority for getting paid at the moment, with suppliers like IT companies taking precedence. But the lawyer acknowledges that their firm "will be doing the same with our own creditors as well".
Murphy recommends that firms facing difficulties talk to a bank about what additional facilities can be put in place to give the firm some breathing room – but emphasises that this would need to be done sooner rather than later.
The U.K. government recently announced that it would defer value-added tax (VAT) bills while the pandemic continues, easing some of the pressure on cash flows.
A London-based legal recruiter said the measure has been gratefully received by firms.
"The government introducing VAT holidays has been incredibly welcomed by law firm management we have spoken to — WIP can be deferred now, which will help their financial positions. So the true impact is unlikely to emerge until next year and in the following years," he said.
The impact of the crisis on bonuses and redundancies are also high on lawyers' agendas, according to the Legal Week survey.
The majority of respondents to the poll said that they expect bonuses either to be much smaller for the coming year, or to not be paid at all across any level of seniority.
And as well as an expected short-term impact on bonuses, many lawyers fear the pandemic disruption could have longer term affects on job safety.
The majority of lawyers said that they expect redundancies, with 47% of respondents saying that they expect firms to review support functions and look to "trim excess fat". Another 30% added that they predict firms will undergo a "dramatic restructuring of their practices".
As well as individual cuts and practice restructurings, nearly 56% of lawyers expect firms' global footprint could take a hit, and that their least profitable offices are likely to to be permanently shuttered in the coming weeks and months.
Murphy added: "In an environment where we've been talking endlessly about the war for talent, are firms now going to start shedding that staff? If the impact of this carries on for months, they may well do. If the impact is going to be short lived, maybe it won't. But in such an uncertain environment, law firm leaders may eventually be forced to make that call."
Read more
More UK Listed Firms Slash Salaries, Payouts to Halt COVID-19 Losses
Lessons From Hong Kong in the Time of Coronavirus
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Get Your House in Order' SFO Warns Corporates, as UK Government Issues Long-Awaited Fraud Guidance
Are More Canadian Lawyers Bailing on Big Law to Found Their Own Firms?
4 minute readIs Saudi Arabia's Khoshaim & Associates' Abu Dhabi Debut a Harbinger of Change?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250