Law Society Asks Bank of England if Firms Can Access Government Loan Scheme
'All law firms will definitely be looking at ways to borrow money right now,' says one partner.
March 31, 2020 at 08:48 AM
3 minute read
Law firms are awaiting a response from the Bank of England after the Law Society asked if the legal profession will be able to access government loans designed to help businesses cope with coronavirus disruption.
A person at the Law Society said the U.K. body wrote to the Bank of England last week to seek clarification on whether law firms were eligible for the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF), a government package worth £330 billion to help support struggling businesses struck by financial strains caused by the outbreak.
The package includes a Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme offering loans of up to £5 million for SMEs, and a lending facility to help aid liquidity at larger institutions, according to the government's website.
But the CCFF covers mostly incorporated companies with significant revenues, customer base and operations in the U.K. The Law Society is seeking clarification as to whether law firms could apply.
The answer is expected to be of interest for a variety of firms that are struggling to manage their finances amid a dearth of corporate and financial transactions.
One corporate partner at a U.S. law firm commented: "All law firms will definitely be looking at ways to borrow money right now. Smaller firms might go for SME loans, while bigger ones might look at loans that could offer up to £50 million.
"Transactions are on hold, so this is a difficult time for all firms. But really it's a matter of whether firms are well-managed and already have enough cash in the bank, and whether they're eligible for loans."
Another corporate partner at another U.S. firm said that "it's not just a recession, humanity is on hold", and thinks some firms will struggle to pay their staff during the pandemic. He added that many firms would be looking at borrowing from banks and probably won't have any issues paying off their loans once everything goes back to normal.
The Law Society's enquiry comes as several firms are taking steps to protect their financial position amid difficulties brought on by the virus.
On Monday, Allen & Overy confirmed it is holding a cash call and reducing partner profit distributions during the outbreak.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 2When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 5Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250