Q&A: Sophie Pelé of Dechert on the Value, and Price, of COVID-19 Research
Pelé, a partner and specialist in European regulation, discusses legal issues facing companies racing to develop treatments, tests and vaccines to fight the new coronavirus.
April 01, 2020 at 06:16 PM
4 minute read
Researchers around the globe are racing to develop COVID-19 treatments, tests and vaccines that can be released safely to the public. Sophie Pelé, a national partner at Dechert in Paris and a specialist in European regulation for the health care and life sciences sectors, spoke this week with Law.com International about the legal issues involved in balancing speed with scientific rigor, and public good with financial rights.
The scientific community is under tremendous pressure to come up with treatments and a vaccine soon. What is the legal and regulatory climate in which researchers, in both the public and private sectors, are working in Europe?
While there is sharp debate among scientists about the value of clinical trials during a health crisis such as this one, the prevailing view is that we should not give up on international standards and methodology for the sake of expeditiousness. We have noticed that the authorities in Europe have softened the procedures for getting reliable clinical trials set up and approved. There is an ongoing exchange between companies and governments to tailor and organize and validate trials, and the regulators have committed to moving COVID-related reviews to the head of the line. On the other hand, there has been no discussion of relaxed standards, and no movement to relax product liability.
Health authorities have said that it will take a year to develop an effective COVID-19 vaccine, get it approved, and bring it to market. Based on your knowledge of the sector, do you think that estimate is accurate?
I think it is a fair hypothesis. I would like to think it would be sooner. But a vaccine is a new molecule, which will need to be developed. With treatments, what we are seeing is a repurposing of existing drugs for use against COVID-19. The new use will still have to be tested and approved, but a vaccine will take longer because of the development phase.
As counsel for companies involved in research and development of COVID-19 drugs and tests, what are some of the legal issues you look out for on behalf of your clients?
Aside from the regulatory process, there are issues that come up immediately during the crisis, and issues that will come up after the crisis is past.
One of the immediate issues involves financial rights. In a crisis, governments are looking for quick cooperation from companies. The discussions need to go fast, and the companies are in a poor position to negotiate over their financial rights, including prices for their products. So what you'll see is an agreement over quantities to be produced, for example, with the financial terms to be negotiated after the crisis is past. We saw this in 2009 during H1N1, or avian flu. The goal is to find the most expeditious way to provide the product and yet guarantee minimum rights for the client.
Other issues involve the consequences of making the products. Force majeure exceptions can be an issue because the contractual obligation to supply the products can come up against the difficulties of producing them: There may be a shortage of materials because of supply-chain issues, or employment issues such as the safety of your premises. And, of course, product liability in the case of adverse events always has to be taken into account.
What challenges do you expect to come up for the sector after the COVID-19 crisis is past?
The price of innovation. We can't forget that health care systems are not just targeting COVID-19. There are a lot of innovative drugs being developed, and after this crisis, health systems are likely to have acute concerns about budgets. But one of the lessons of this crisis is that it is worth investing in innovation.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Travers Smith's AI Training, Development Efforts
From Olympic Aspirations to Legal Innovation: Tom Dunlop's Journey to Founding Summize
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250