Hogan Lovells Pay Gap Jumps To Favour Men As More Firms Reveal Ethnicity and LGBT Data
Slaughters gender pay gap has also increased while Hogan Lovells has reported its sexuality pay gap for the first time.
April 02, 2020 at 10:51 AM
3 minute read
Slaughter and May, Eversheds Sutherland and Hogan Lovells are the latest firms to reveal their U.K. gender pay gap, with Eversheds and Hogan Lovells also opting to reveal their respective ethnicity and sexuality pay gaps for the first time.
Hogan Lovells partner gender pay gap has increased by over 10%, after last year it reported a positive pay gap in favour of female partners of -2.1%.
The firm has now recorded a partner pay gap of 8.7% in favour of male partners., while its employee only gender pay gap also increased, to 18.7%. The combined pay gap for both groups increased 4.9% to 57.8%.
This year the firm recorded its pay gap based on sexual orientation for the first time, and recorded a favourable pay gap to employees identifying as LBTQ+ standing at -13% in 2019. For the partnership alone, however, it recorded a gap of 59.6%.
Meanwhile its ethnicity pay gap showed that its UK employees and partners combined pay gap went down 0.5% to 45.8%. The total compensation pay gap for the partnership went up 5.1% to 17.9% while its employees only metric showed it had decreased by 1.6% to 9.6% in 2019.
Slaughters partnership gender pay gap has widened from 8.9% to hit 10.5% based on figures for the 12 months to the end of April 2019. Including employees, the mean pay gap at the firm has increased to 16.2%, compared with 14.4% last year, when the firm announced its partner gender pay gap and ethnicity pay gap for the first time.
The firm's mean ethnicity pay gap for employees overall has remained almost flat at 9.4%. But for combined figures for partners and employees, the gap has increased by 3% to reach 54.1%.
Eversheds' combined partner and employee mean pay gap stayed largely flat on last year at 57.8%, while the combined bonus gap sits at 43.2%, down from 47.6%.
The firm has maintained a negative gender pay gap among equity partners of 5.64%, slightly down on the 2018 snapshot figure of 6.2%. For its partnership as a whole, the firm now has a gender pay gap of just 3.44%.
The firm's combined ethnicity pay gap stands at 33.7% though the firm measured a negative ethnicity pay gap of 5% for its black and mixed ethnicity partners.
As at the beginning of April 2019, 12.3% of Eversheds 2,422 U.K. employees self-identified as minority ethnic, including 5.5% of the partnership, according to the report.
Last month, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer also disclosed theirs despite the fact that the government has halted gender pay gap reporting due to the pandemic this year.
Read more:
Macfarlanes Fails to Make Dent in Gender Pay Gap, Reveals Ethnicity Figures
White & Case London Gender Pay Gap Jumps 8% For Contract Partners
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoodwin Enlisted for $1.15 Billion GSK Acquisition of US Biopharma Business
Pallas Partners Founder On the Disputes Trends to Look Out For in 2025
4 minute readJenner & Block Expands London Team with Baker McKenzie Hire to Lead New Practice Area
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Case With 'Serious Consequences for Corporate Law' Heads to Texas Supreme Court
- 2Oil Co. Alleges Plot to Drive Away Competition in NYC's Liquid Fuel Market
- 3Takeaways From Day One of Pam Bondi’s Confirmation Hearing
- 4Greenberg Traurig, Holland & Knight Leaders Expect AI Investments to Jump in 2025
- 5NY Lawmaker Eager to Advance 'Weinstein Bill' in 2025 to Open Door to Evidence of Prior Sexual Offenses
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250