Nonprofit Files Human Rights Suit Against Banana Giant Chiquita Brands International
EarthRights International seeks compensation for more than 200 Colombians who were allegedly tortured or had family members killed by paramilitaries.
April 02, 2020 at 05:40 PM
3 minute read
The nonprofit EarthRights International has filed a lawsuit against Chiquita Brands International on behalf of more than 200 Colombians, alleging the plaintiffs experienced violence at the hands of paramilitary agents funded by the banana company.
The demand for a jury trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleges that Chiquita engaged in a "campaign of terror" in order to maintain control of a Colombian banana-growing region from at least 1992 through 2004.
"In order to produce bananas in an environment free from labor opposition and social disturbances, Chiquita funded, armed, and otherwise supported these paramilitary groups," the complaint says.
The lawsuit revives an earlier suit filed by Earthrights in 2007. In that case, the nonprofit filed a class action suit on behalf of victims in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida. But in September of last year, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra denied class status in that suit and dismissed a handful of individual plaintiffs' cases.
The new claims by EarthRights are brought by alleged victims who would have been members of the class action case dismissed in Florida.
The plaintiffs are family members of trade unionists, banana workers, political organizers, social activists and others allegedly threatened, tortured and killed by paramilitary organizations, according to the complaint.
No one at Chiquita's U.S. headquarters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, could be reached for comment.
Chiquita has faced a number of lawsuits related to its activities in Colombia. In 2007, it confessed to financing a designated global terrorist group in a U.S. criminal case and agreed to pay a $25 million fine.
In early 2018, Chiquita settled lawsuits brought by the families of Americans killed in Colombia by armed groups that Chiquita admittedly paid. Terms of the settlement were confidential, but the families were seeking tens of millions of dollars.
EarthRights communications director Kate Fried said the complaint was filed electronically and business shutdowns in the U.S. aimed at containing the spread of the new coronavirus have not yet impacted the proceedings. Arguments are set for the week of May 18.
EarthRights argues that Chiquita funded, armed and otherwise supported paramilitaries in Colombia so as to quell labor opposition that could stifle banana production. The deaths of plaintiffs' relatives, it says, were "a direct, foreseeable, and intended result" of that support.
"We are not backing away from accountability for Chiquita," said Marco Simons, general counsel for EarthRights. "In its desire to maximize profits, the company chose to do business in a conflict zone and then financed death squads as part of a strategy to protect those operations, contributing to the murder, rape, and torture of thousands of Colombians."
Chiquita's counsel has not yet been made public. In previous suits, Blank Rome has represented the company.
Two Brazilian companies purchased Chiquita in 2015 and moved its U.S. headquarters from Cincinnati to Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
READ MORE
3 US Execs Indicted in Chiquita Terrorist Funding Probe in Colombia
Families Settle With Chiquita Over Deaths of Americans in Colombia
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Hires 7-Lawyer Team to Beef Up ESG Practice in Brussels
2 minute readKirkland’s O’Shea Acts Alongside Former Outfit Simpson Thacher on KKR Deal
2 minute readKing & Spalding and Ex-Partner Accused of Fraud After Client Claims £1.7 Million Deposit Loss
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250