UK Lawyer Loses Law License Due to Loss and Cover-Up of Sensitive SRA Documents
The lawyer was also made to pay costs of £10,000 after leaving documents on a train and then claiming to have them at her home.
April 03, 2020 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
A solicitor who lost a briefcase of sensitive documents relating to an ongoing Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) case and then lied about having them at her house has lost her license to practice law.
According to a judgement decision published in March 2020 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Claire Matthews, a solicitor in the clinical law team at Capsticks, covered up the fact that she had left the briefcase on a train in May 2018.
The tribunal found that she subsequently told her colleague that she still had the briefcase, which belonged to the co-worker, at her flat and then a week later told her supervisor that she had left it on the train just that morning.
The SDT ruled in March that Matthews should lose her license to practice law and pay costs of £10,000, reduced from £18,00 owing to her current means.
The lost documents related to a claim being made against the SRA by an individual, Person X, who claimed that the SRA had failed to deal with their subject access request under the Data Protection Act. They included court orders, witness statements as well as sensitive personal information on Person X.
The SRA later had to explain the loss of sensitive material to Person X and compensate them for their loss.
In her mitigation, Matthews, who denied allegations of misconduct and dishonesty, claimed that she "sincerely regretted" the incident and that she had acted in "panic."
Capsticks dismissed her in June 2018, less than a month after the incident took place. Matthews had only been at Capsticks for less than a month when the incident occured.
Ruling that Matthews had acted dishonestly, the tribunal stated that while the loss of the briefcase on the train had been unfortunate, "it was the poor choices the respondent had made thereafter which directly gave rise to the misconduct found by the Tribunal to have occurred."
Capsticks was contacted for comment.
|Read more
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250