Baker McKenzie Maintains Lawyer Pay in Australia While Others Make Cuts
Instead of making cuts, the firm has increased working flexibility for staff, offering the possibility of adjusted hours, reduced hours, and taking accrued carers or annual/long service leave.
April 06, 2020 at 04:17 PM
2 minute read
Global law firm Baker McKenzie has thus far not cut pay or reduced working hours for lawyers in its Australian offices, despite several other firms doing so in response to the economic impact of the coronavirus.
"Baker McKenzie's Australian offices have made no layoffs, no cuts in pay, and not introduced any mandatory reductions in working hours," national managing partner Anthony Foley said in a statement.
Instead, the firm undertook an all-staff survey last week to determine the support that staff needed while working from home.
As a result, the firm has increased working flexibility for staff to help them manage their duties of caring for other members of their households, "particularly for those with young children given the closure of schools and day care centers and the demands of homeschooling," Foley said.
The voluntary options include the possibility of adjusted hours, reduced hours, and taking accrued carers or annual/long service leave.
While Baker McKenzie has not cut pay, several other firms in Australia have, including MinterEllison and Gilbert + Tobin.
Allen & Overy's Australian offices have also adjusted partner pay as part of what the firm refers to as "prudent management measures as part of our ongoing scenario planning."
These include "adjustments to the phasing of profit distribution to partners, increasing partner capital levels, deferring certain investments and recruitment, and canceling events."
The firm will still award bonuses for this financial year, with bonus payments for fee-earners and more senior support staff split between its normal payment date in July and October's payroll.
"A&O retains good diversification across practices and one of the broadest international offerings among the global elite firms so we are confident in our resilience if economic conditions worsen," the firm said in a statement.
Local Australian law firm Hall & Wilcox will also adjust partner distributions this year, the Australian legal news publication Lawyers Weekly reported.
"We want to manage our business to come through this and be well-positioned for what we anticipate will be a 'V' shaped recovery," managing partner Tony Macvean is quoted as saying.
"Unfortunately, we're not in a position to comment at this stage," a spokeswoman for the firm said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readBlocking of $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Milbank’s Capital Markets Partner Leaves for China’s Han Kun in Hong Kong
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250