Norton Rose Fulbright Cuts Australian Lawyer Pay as PwC Reduces Hours and Local Partner Drawdowns
NRF's actions are similar to those the firm took last week at its offices in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
April 07, 2020 at 06:33 AM
4 minute read
Norton Rose Fulbright is reducing the hours and pay of most of its Australian staff by as much as 20% to match the lower volume of work required and cutting partner drawdowns.
The news comes as PwC Australia also reduces its partner drawdowns, with the Big Four firm yesterday saying most employees will work a four-day week, including those at PwC Law.
DLA Piper, meanwhile, joined the ranks of firms including Clayton Utz and Baker McKenzie in Australia in not cutting hours or salaries.
Norton Rose said is it is not immune from the business impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and expects work in some practice area to reduce in the coming months.
The London-headquartered firm is adopting a system of 'flex' work in Australia, which will reduce individual staff hours by up to 20% depending on the work required, with a corresponding drop in remuneration.
The firm last week took similar steps at its offices in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
"The ability for our staff to flex will ensure that we are able to retain as many roles as possible during this crisis. The underlying philosophy behind our proposal is a simple one – we are asking our people to face this situation together and, by acting as one, to come through this stronger," managing partner in Australia Wayne Spanner and managing partner-elect Alison Deitz said in a combined statement.
"Our partners are very proud of the way our people have responded to remote working so far, with nearly 1000 staff transitioning quickly and seamlessly to working from home without any disruption to client service."
The firm is also standing down the 2 to 3% of its workforce who are unable to perform their duties under work-from-home arrangements.
Additionally, recruitment and salary reviews have been paused and partner draws will be temporarily reduced. The firm declined to say by how much.
"We believe the comprehensive steps we are taking are an appropriate and prudent response, but of course none of us can predict exactly how long and how severe the COVID-19 crisis will be," the firm leaders said. "Coupled with our strong foundation and continued dedication to assist clients in areas of great demand, we are confident our business will emerge from this crisis in a strong position and ready to embrace an improving economy."
It is the latest firm in Australia to cut staff pay or partner drawdowns.
The 700 partners and 8,000 strong workforce at PwC Australia, including its legal arm, will mostly work a four day week from May 1 at the latest, with a corresponding reduction in remunerations.
Partner income draws have been reduced by 20%, commencing from March 1 this year and the firm expects partner incomes for the 2020-21 financial year will be reduced in the range of 30 to 40%, with no bonuses.
"We have made a commitment to our people to do everything we can to protect jobs and not make people redundant as a result of Covid-19," CEO elect Tom Seymour said in a statement. "Whilst we cannot underestimate the significant impact this health crisis is having on the economy, it will pass, and when it does, we need our skilled workforce ready to go and able to support our clients as the economy powers back up."
DLA Piper said the firm is closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on its business in Australia and there has so far been no material downturn in business, but expects this will come.
"We are managing our costs carefully and have taken steps like deferring non-essential projects, pursuing only business-essential recruitment, deferring salary increases and other costs, where possible," the firm said in a statement. "We have not proposed cuts to staff, reduced working hours or reduced partner drawings."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250