Gary Senior Hearing to Resume via Zoom
The hearing will resume as scheduled on April 27.
April 08, 2020 at 09:48 AM
3 minute read
The hearing into former Baker McKenzie partner Gary Senior will go ahead as scheduled on April 27 via video conferencing app Zoom, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) decided on Wednesday.
Senior's hearing originally started in December, but was then adjourned midway through until April 27 due to a respondent unable to attend the hearing.
However, in light of the COVID-19 lockdown, the tribunal closed its offices on March 18, according to its website.
During Monday's case management hearing looking into whether to adjourn or hold Gary Senior's late April hearing virtually, the tribunal decided it would be best to go ahead with the hearing as scheduled via Zoom.
During the hearing, the barristers for Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Baker McKenzie, Gary Senior, and former partner Tom Cassels argued that there is "no compelling reason" not to hold the hearing remotely at the end of this month.
Andrew Tabachnik QC, barrister for the SRA in this case, argued that due to the uncertainty caused by the pandemic over when all participants would be able to reconvene in court, a further adjournment would be detrimental to the case.
He said: "We could quite easily go well into next year before another hearing could be facilitated."
Jonathan Laidlaw QC, barrister for former Baker McKenzie human resources head Martin Blackburn, argued the case should be adjourned for another four months, although Blackburn has not made a formal application for adjournment yet.
Laidlaw argued in the hearing that the tribunal has already been looking at potential dates to hold it conventionally in late September or in December, in light of the extraordinary circumstances.
He added that the possibility that any of the participants in this case may catch the virus by the end of the month should also be considered, and therefore adjourning the hearing would be reasonable.
As one of the SDT's first ever virtual hearings, the attendees experienced some tech issues which led to a 10-minute pause, and moment at the start of the hearing where a lawyer spoke without knowing that their microphone was on.
Senior stands accused of sexual harassment allegedly perpetrated on a junior associate in 2012. Baker McKenzie, Tom Cassels as well as Martin Blackburn are all accused of having mishandled the internal investigation into the matter at the time.
In December, Senior admitted in court that his behaviour towards the junior associate amounted to sexual harassment. He also recounted during his cross-examination that he had suffered "acute stress" at the time the internal investigation was handled.
The case will resume with Martin Blackburn's cross-examination on April 27.
Read more:
'I Kind of Wished I Was Dead', Gary Senior Tells Disciplinary Tribunal
Gary Senior Investigators 'Betrayed Their Colleagues', Baker McKenzie London Head Claimed
Gary Senior Admits Harassment, But Denies 'Micro-Managing' Investigation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Strengthens Tokyo Office With Partner Hire From Big Four Japanese Firm AMT
K&L Gates Duo Leaves to Reunite with Former Leader at Sreenivasan Chambers
Clifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Walt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
- 2The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
- 3Is 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
- 4Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
- 5Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250