How Do Partners Feel About COVID-Driven Pay Changes?
Despite the effects, many partners feel strongly that cutting drawings is the right thing to do.
April 16, 2020 at 12:47 AM
4 minute read
Being the first to have your pay cut is not nice in any circumstances, but amid the pandemic crisis several law firm partners are speaking out in favour of the move.
Steps taken by firms to maintain a healthy business to date have included furloughing staff, asking partners to contribute capital to the business, and freezing pay rises and bonuses.
But it is cutting or delaying distributions to partners that seems to have the most support, even from among those affected.
One partner at a U.K.-headquartered firm that has made changes to its partners distributions says that it is "entirely prudent for a firm to take that step".
"My impersonal view is that if you are a firm with a distribution date coming up, I don't see why you would make that distribution," they add.
"It all comes down to being a partnership and working in a socially cohesive way with the rest of the firm. You behave in a way you'd want to be remembered for."
"You behave in a way you'd want to be remembered for"
Another partner at a Magic Circle firm says that they would prefer that the responsibilities to keep firms ticking over should sit more with the partnership in order to protect other firm employees, saying: "It's us that really ought to take the weight of the pain on this."
They acknowledge, however, that if the pandemic goes on for longer than expected, "even individuals like me can eventually get into a position where things would get difficult".
Firms that have cut or delayed partner drawings so far to limit the impact of COVID-19 on their balance sheet include the likes of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Allen & Overy; Linklaters; Herbert Smith Freehills; Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner; and Simmons & Simmons.
"If Freshfields feels the need to do it, why the hell aren't we doing it too?"
One partner at a global firm believes that despite the firm's hedging as an international, full-service business, it should take a "harder approach" to the firm's finances, adding that they would "certainly stop the bonus distributions" as it would "send a good message to our staff that we are taking this seriously" and not taking bonuses at their expense.
And, they say: "If Freshfields feels the need to do it, why the hell aren't we doing it too?"
One partner at a U.S. firm in London believes that retaining distributions is possibly more needed at U.K. firms, which tend to pay out to partners on an accrual, rather than collection basis — meaning that U.K. firms may have budgeted for more client bills to have been collected than are likely to come in as businesses tighten their belts during the global lockdown.
Across the whole market, one thing does seem fairly certain: it is better to be safe than sorry when it comes to the health of the business.
But clients say that they will be watching how firms respond to this crisis, with the legal head of betting company GVC Holdings saying that customers may look unfavorably upon firms that look to cut staff rather than eat into partner profits.
The Magic Circle partner acknowledges that while it can be difficult to see the driving forces for new financial measures from the outside looking into a firm, they hope clients will look at law firms and think that their response was reasonable and proportionate.
"I hope at the end of this, clients will look at the professional services industry and think that we handled this as well as we could have."
|Read more
Taylor Wessing Furloughs Staff and Suspends Distributions in UK
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Spies Reveal How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
5 minute read'Get Your House in Order' SFO Warns Corporates, as UK Government Issues Long-Awaited Fraud Guidance
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250