Quinn, Freshfields Gear Up for Major UK Supreme Court Showdown... Via Videolink
The COVID-19 lockdown means the next phase of the multi-billion pound Mastercard case will take place virtually.
April 16, 2020 at 07:28 AM
4 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer are making the final preparations for next month's U.K. Supreme Court hearing in the major £14 billion Mastercard saga, which will proceed via videolink.
The case, which is set to play out its final phases in the Supreme Court on May 13, is according to people close to the matter, likely to be a precedent-setting case that will have significant consequences for subsequent civil cases.
The hearing will take place by Webex videolink, according to a person involved in the matter, in view of the lockdown imposed amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The parties have also been in regular contact with clients using WhatsApp, according to one person close to the matter, as technology plays an increasingly pivotal role in court matters.
This week, lawyers at Quinn filed their case with lawyers at Freshfields, in the latest step ahead of the appeal hearing next month.
The credit card giant stands accused of inflating interchange fees – a sum charged between Mastercard and banks – which was then passed on to traders using card machines, and in turn onto consumers. It faces a potential consumer collective action brought by Quinn client and former financial ombudsman Walter Merricks on behalf of around 46 million consumers for damages of £14 billion.
The claim, which purports to account for overcharges over a 16-year period between 1992 and 2008, would, if successful, result in the U.K.'s highest ever damages payout. Merricks and his team have since 2016 pursued what would be the U.K.'s first major 'opt-out' action, ushered in by the Consumer Rights Act 2015, by which all relevant U.K. consumers could be party to the action and receive a share of the payout, unless they opted out.
The case has seen Quinn and Freshfields trade blows since 2017, when, siding with Mastercard, the Competition Appeal Tribunal halted the potential collective action. However, exactly a year ago today, the U.K. Court of Appeal set aside the tribunal's ruling, finding that it had "applied too high a bar" as it made findings on how damages might be distributed, the person involved in the case said. For Quinn, it was a significant, albeit short lived, victory, as Freshfields late last year won the right to appeal the decision at the Supreme Court.
Next month, the Supreme Court will start by considering two main issues, the partner said. First, the legal 'certification test' that the Competition Appeal Tribunal must apply in deciding whether or not to allow proposed collective proceedings to go forward. And second, whether the tribunal is entitled to take account of whether any distribution of damages to members of the proposed class would bear any relationship at all to the tort law principle of compensatory damages.
Acting for Mastercard, the Freshfields team is being led by global antitrust litigation co-head Mark Sansom and senior associate Ricky Versteeg, with support from Mark Hoskins QC, Hugo Leith and former Freshfields partner Jon Lawrence of Brick Court Chambers, and Matthew Cook of One Essex Court.
Quinn, meanwhile, is deploying a team fronted by partners Boris Bronfentrinker and Nicola Chesaites, and senior associate Leo Kitchen, with a counsel team comprising Paul Harris QC of Monckton Chambers, and Marie Demetriou QC and Victoria Wakefield QC of Brick Court Chambers.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Continues Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Ted Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 142. Elections Are Good for Big Law, Just Don’t Get Too Close
- 2Rudy Giuliani's Attorneys Seek Withdrawal in Debt Enforcement Case
- 3SEC, South Florida Developer Rishi Kapoor Reach Settlement
- 4Senate Democrats Advance 4th Circuit Pick Ryan Park’s Nomination
- 5Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250