£40M: Dechert and Gerrard's Estimated ENRC Trial Costs
The trial in the near-decade long dispute is set to start in June 2021.
April 17, 2020 at 08:27 AM
3 minute read
Dechert and its white collar head Neil Gerrard could face costs estimated at around £40 million in the long-running dispute with the Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC), documents show.
According to a document presented in court last month on behalf of the ENRC, total costs attributed to Dechert and Gerrard "in defending their claim [against the ENRC]" are estimated to come at £33.9 million plus VAT, for a total of around £40 million.
Dechert and Gerrard stand accused of breach of confidence for allegedly having leaked confidential information to the press and to the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) when Gerrard was acting for the ENRC at the time, resulting in losses for ENRC.
The firm and Gerrard have now applied for 'security for costs', according to the document and a person close to the matter, in the event that they are successful, and that the losing party does not pay the costs.
A footnote on the document also reveals that " billed costs [for the firm and Gerrard] up to 17 January 2020 amount to around £16 million (including around 26,000 hours of partner/associate time and around 23,500 hours of trainee/paralegal time)."
A spokesperson for ENRC said in a statement: "It is extraordinary that Dechert's partners and insurers continue to spend tens of millions of pounds defending Neil Gerrard, amidst allegations against him in no less than three separate sets of proceedings, including serious allegations of threats, human rights abuses and torture."
Dechert did not provide a comment in time for publication but a spokesperson for the firm has previously said: "We emphatically reject any allegations about a leak from Dechert."
According to the document, a case management conference is listed to take place on May 6-7, 2020.
Dechert and Gerrard are concurrently attempting to fend off a separate case, brought by Jordanian lawyer Karam Al Sadeq, who has accused Gerrard of coercing him into "agreeing to give false evidence" during an investigation.
A spokesperson for Dechert and Gerrard previously denied all allegations against the firm and its personnel: "The allegations against the firm and its personnel are completely without foundation and we shall be vigorously defending ourselves against them."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFCA Fines Metro Bank £16.7M Over ‘Financial Crime Failings’
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 2The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 3Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 4Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 5Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250