Hong Kong Lawyers Arrested in Connection With Last Year's Pro-Democracy Protests
Barrister Martin Lee and solicitor Albert Ho are among the 15 public figures arrested April 18 over their alleged roles in organizing last year's political protests.
April 20, 2020 at 03:58 PM
3 minute read
Two prominent lawyers were among 15 public figures arrested in Hong Kong on April 18 for their alleged roles in organizing last year's political protests, prompting the Hong Kong Bar Association to criticize the move as one that "could be perceived as interference," in contravention of Hong Kong's Basic Law, the local Constitution.
The police arrested 15 people on suspicion of organizing or participating in unauthorized public assemblies in Hong Kong last summer and fall when pro-democracy demonstrations were at their height. The arrests marked the biggest roundup of prominent opposition figures in recent memory.
Among those arrested were Martin Lee, an internationally known barrister and founder of the Democratic Party, one of Hong Kong's main pro-democratic political parties, and Albert Ho, a solicitor and partner at his own practice who is also also a former chair of the Democratic Party and now leads the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China, another opposition group.
The other prominent figures arrested included businessman and media tycoon Jimmy Lai and opposition politicians Leung Kwok-hung, Lee Cheuk-yan, Au Nok-hin and Yeung Sum.
In June 2019, Martin Lee, who is considered the most senior barrister in Hong Kong and was called the city's "father of democracy" when he co-founded the Democratic Party in 1994, led a legal community march in protest against a proposed law that would potentially allow the extradition of criminals to mainland China. The extradition bill controversy eventually led to violent clashes between the government and anti-government organizations that lasted for the rest of the year.
Ho also appeared at the lawyers' march and has been a vocal supporter of the protest movement.
The high-profile arrests came as Hong Kong continues its fight to contain the coronavirus outbreak. The spread of the virus quelled the huge street protests that had regularly taken place for at least six months last year, as people were forced to stay home to avoid contagion.
But the arrests April 18 were seen as another crackdown by pro-Beijing forces on the anti-government movement. The Hong Kong Bar Association cautioned against perceived increased interference in Hong Kong's local affairs by the Chinese government, saying it violated the "one country, two systems" principle established for Hong Kong when Great Britain returned the region to China in 1997.
The Hong Kong Bar issued a statement calling on Chinese authorities to refrain from interfering with Hong Kong law and said the comments by Beijing's representatives "could easily be perceived as interference" in contravention of Hong Kong's Basic Law, the local Constitution.
The central government's liaison office responded that as Beijing's designated representative in Hong Kong, the law prohibiting departments of China's central government from interfering in Hong Kong affairs did not apply.
That prompted the bar association to issue a second statement in which it strongly disagreed with the liaison office, citing the specific articles included in Hong Kong's constitution. It also said recent public statements have caused "deep public unease" and undermine confidence in the government's "commitment to the principle and practice of one-country, two-systems enshrined in the Basic Law."
Related Stories:
Lawyers March as Hong Kong Stands in Defiance of China Extradition Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250