Korean Bank Fined $86M for Compliance Shortfalls, Transfer of Funds to Iran
As part of a settlement with the U.S. government and New York State, the bank will forfeit $51 million and pay a civil fine of $35 million.
April 21, 2020 at 02:19 PM
2 minute read
The Industrial Bank of Korea, one of South Korea's largest banks, will pay $86 million to settle U.S. and New York state criminal and civil charges that the bank allowed an illegal transfer of more than $1 billion to Iran that violated U.S. sanctions.
The settlement includes the forfeiture of $51 million, plus a $35 million civil fine to the New York State Department of Financial Services.
In a statement, the government said the Korean bank repeatedly failed to establish adequate internal policies and risk control systems compliant with the New York Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering regulations.
The government said that Industrial Bank of Korea client Kenneth Zong, a U.S. citizen, circumvented U.S. sanctions laws by transferring funds from restricted accounts to his personal account in Korean won, converted the funds into U.S. dollars and transferred them to individuals and entities in Iran.
In 2016, the Industrial Bank of Korea reached an agreement to improve its compliance and risk management programs. The New York Department of Financial Services said while the bank made substantial improvements in parts of its compliance program between 2016 and 2018, subsequent safety and soundness examinations found that the compliance with anti-money laundering laws and regulations had declined even further. The bank also was found to be out of compliance with the state's Transaction Monitoring and Filtering Regulation.
As part of the settlement, the Industrial Bank of Korea has agreed to submit a written plan to revise its 2016 agreement with the government and improve its compliance and customer due diligence programs to be in compliance with anti-money laundering and other relevant regulations. The bank is also required to submit quarterly reports to the government on changes in its compliance programs.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHogan Lovells, Khaitan Lead On Beverage Company’s $890M Offering In India
Clifford Chance Adds Two Goodwin Leveraged Finance Specialists as Partners in Paris
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
- 2Letter from Asia: Will Big Law Ever Care to Understand Asia Again?
- 3'Enough is Enough': Trump Defense Attorneys Urge Judge to Dismiss New York 'Hush Money' Case
- 4Ogletree Deakins Expanding to Baltimore, Adding 16-Lawyer Boutique
- 5Top Five Patent Law Decisions of 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250